Why did time magazine state we will not win in Iraq?

Question

They reported the war is doomed in Iraq and Bush is trying a face saving way out.

Answer 1

Time magazine made that statement because it is true. There was never any chance of us winning in Iraq from the very first day. Those people didn't want us over there. Bush had the power and like the saying goes "absolute power corrupts absolutely". So he decided to lie his way into a war. A war that has cost the American taxpayer billions and caused grief to thousands of families in both our country and Iraq. Middle Eastern countries and people from this region are accustomed to fighting wars for centuries. One family may be upset that Abdul called Achmed a camel humping toehead 600 years ago and they are stiil pi**ed about it. We as Americans want to get in...f*ck things up....and get out...which is exactly what we've done in Iraq. Anybody that doesn't see this is blind. And anybody that thinks that this country won't be back the way it was with another despot like Hussein in power 6 months after we've declared "job well done" is an freaking idiot!!!!!

Answer 2

You make a few well factor’s ma'am. Many of those elements had been the groundwork for President Bush's now notorious "Mission Accomplished" speech. However, whatever that nobody would've ever foreseen took situation in a while after that speech; the overseas warring parties began pouring in. Was it Iran and Syria who initiated this? Was it Bin Laden's Al Qaeda? We would possibly certainly not recognize for certain. What we do recognize for distinct is that it's now a foremost difficulty. There are many, many extra accomplishments that our executive has completed in Iraq that you simply all again within the States simply certainly not see, frequently as a result of media bias (sorry however "a hundred and ten useless in suicide bombing" sells bigger than "U.S. Soldiers construct institution for Iraqi Children" does.) At this factor, profitable is approximately getting Iran, Syria and the terrorists out. If we do not do that earlier than we depart the quandary gets so risky that it would very good draw the whole Middle East into battle. It's additionally approximately making certain that the Iraqi Military is not only re-enacted, however able and in a position as good. I've visible stories that we can not get ample Iraqis to volunteer. This is fully unfaithful. The reality of the problem is they exhibit up every day in historical numbers, despite the risk of being blowing up! The predicament, then, is screening them for abilities infiltrators after which coaching them. We would not have ample men and women to try this. So, till Iraq is competent to guard itself from external aggressors, regardless of the entire battles we have now received, we've not received the battle.

Answer 3

Time magi zine is looking at the will of the people and basing their opinion on what the people are saying, and they are right if the people don''t have the will to fight , "we can not win" But, all of you people wake up and look at what you have to lose if we don't win, the Muslims number al,most 25%of the worlds population and growing faster than any other religion, now think what their bible teaches them, "THE INFIDEL MUST DIE OR CONVERT" do you want to convert to a religion from the dark ages,and bow down to some rug head? do you want your children raised in this type of enviorment? if not then you had better start pushing G.W.B. to add more troops to Iraq and Afghanistan and give our military free rein or else the Muslims will be on yours and my door step with their bombs and guns , raping your daughters , wives mothers etc, so what will it be America, surrender or fight, I had rather be dead than under their control , is life that important to you that you won't even make a stand for freedom, if so then let our men do it for you , just don't tie their hands , and they do need your moral support,
If we lose here it won't be like Viet Nam or Korea, losing her means America will fall as the Muslim's will have new energy and know we are to weak to defend our selves , giving them encouragement to attack, attack attack until the will of these weak people surrender,

Answer 4

because they have history
we poor french new you had no chance of winning this war because "been there done that" during "algerie" war
t was just after 2WW we had the weapon much more meen loads of french living in the country and most of the local pop actually on our side
and we lost so bad.....;;;
you had no chance in irak never had armies cannot fight and win against the kind of attaks you had in irak not possible

and facts proove me and the TIME right :)

Answer 5

Because it was always a huge mistake as so many people said in 2003. Bush will get out once he has the right propaganda in place so he can blame some one else.

Answer 6

Because Time Magazine views are so far to the left they can only see the world from the lefty loonies point of view.

Answer 7

Because the War on Terror is unwinable, especially with the way we fight it. We can't convince them to willingly become slaves to Capitalism on their own, so we say we are "freeing" them, and force Capitalism on them at the barrel of a gun.

Answer 8

because time magazine is like all liberals they know nothing of fighting,but they are well schooled in running from a fight as they have practiced this art form since grade school!

Answer 9

tell me which war ever has anyone won...

really, think about it... if we win then like we don't have to go back later now do we? it's eternal! it's over forever.. no more wars.

HAHAHA! win a war... my god that's funny.

Answer 10

Yea, I think those bastards looked at the reality on the ground.