Neither. First, god, can't you come up with a better question..... this is really stupid. Secondly, since they are rare crosses, no zoo keeper would even consider putting them together, dude.
2006-10-26 06:02:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by April 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
animals are not as dumb as human beings
first of all they would not have a reason to start the fight
and secondly, supposing for a moment they'd be as low as human beings and thus start a fight, they'd quickly end it and share resources.
the most you see with lions, is a fight between an existing clan leader, and a would be clan leader. This never goes to great lengths (goes much less far than any fight between to drug dealer gangs in any human city). The only nasty thing that happens is that the new leader somehow knows which future births are from him or not, and thus kills the babies that are born too soon to be his.
the worst you see w tigers, is that a mature male on his large territory, while he would fight anoher incoming male and then they'd separate w/o erally nasty wounds, on the other hand might, in some cases, attack even a younger individual who may have chanced on his territory, and potentially inflict serious wounds. But again, it would still be less than the kind of wounds your average thug inflicts on a randomly chosen passer-by.
again, animals are so much more civilised on those matters than human beings are.
and so, by the way, it would be nice if the Yahoo! employees, respectively their "artificial intelligence" program (I use quotes because clearly it is not that smart), stopped with this family of questions, "if animal A fought animal B, who would win". There are dozens of these around, it is getting sooo boooring. Thanks
2006-10-26 13:17:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by AntoineBachmann 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
A liger of course...tigons are pathetic!
Gosh!
2006-10-26 13:07:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Courtlyn 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
OBVIOUSLY it would be the LIGER....only the coolest and toughest animal of all time.
DUH.
2006-10-26 13:05:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Napoleon Dynamite would kick both their tails!
2006-10-26 12:59:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by John S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
obviously the more hungry one of the two-they are both carnivores
2006-10-27 06:25:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither - they'd fight to the death and then the other would bleed to death from the wounds
2006-10-26 12:59:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
neither they'd both kill each other at the same time.
2006-10-26 13:00:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by smarty21 3
·
0⤊
0⤋