Excellent question. In absolute terms, it is of the course in the nature of philosophy (the love, or which amounts to much the same thing, the search for wisdom), that no question can be definitively answered. Nonetheless, for certain people, at certain times, philosophy can satisfactorily resolve existential issues that such people face. For example, although today few people are exisistentialists, the Sartrian notion that existence precedes essence, i.e., that we are absolutely free to choose ourselves, provided a "resolution" to a dilemna a generation was wrestling with. To take another example, although much of Marxist theory is discredited today, and few serious thinkers would hold that it provides THE answer, many people, including some very brilliant ones, have found that it resolved pertitent social, cultural, economic and political questions. So, paradoxically, while it is in the nature of philosophy to be open-ended, philosophical system builders do resolve questions for particular people in particular places at particular times.
2006-10-26 06:07:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by whenharrymetsally 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jah, it really is an wonderful question. Philosophy comes from the Greek, which skill love of understanding. In that spirit the Greeks requested large questions that, in my opinion, can't be genuinely replied or resolved. Socrates suggested the "unexamined existence isn't worth residing." He developed the Socratic frame of mind to wondering. Socrates requested questions, yet did not have faux to have the solutions. We continuously study; a ideas is type of a parachute, it does not artwork except it really is open. Can one teach that God exists or not? (As a minister i position self assurance in Jesus Christ by technique of religion) Can one say how existence must be lived? Aristotle suggested that happiness and moderation were the essence of a good existence. possibly it really is ideal, yet how can we outline happiness? Is happiness received by technique of having interesting, doing duty, or large accomplishments? The Greek truth seeker Epcurus believed that happiness became the avoidance of discomfort. Can a guy experience free on the rack? would one particularly be a contented pig or a useless Socrates? Many critiques might want to easily accept, yet i do not imagine we can completely confirm the final subject matters that philosophy addresses. Philosophy deals with precis wondering. it really is a field it really is careful of simplistic solutions to puzzling subject matters. i'd imagine there will be some questions that would want to be resolved. yet it really is not philosophy's important purpose. It, to me, is more effective moral and religious than clinical.
2016-12-05 06:19:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by blessing 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The category is still in a democratic environment. People vote on the point with which they agree most, or, the asker votes on a response that most appeals to them.
As to your broader question, you are correct in that philosophy is a journey, not a destination.
I suppose you also intended the irony in that your question requires a resolved answer.
2006-10-26 05:36:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Finnegan 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree that all true philosophical questions never have an "answer" but just lead to more questions.
However, like the ppl mentioned above, not all questions in the philosophy category are true philosophical questions.
2006-10-26 05:38:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by steubified 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Now there is a valid point!
Of course it is based upon the assumption that all of the questions posed are truely concerning philosophy!
2006-10-26 05:37:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by susan69me69 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
resolved is a poor choice of words on Yahoo's part. Closed would be more accurate.
2006-10-26 12:22:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sophist 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Heh good question. Philosophy deals in grays, answers deal in black and whites.
So, i guess, like all things, it's sort of personal. Then it's closed.
2006-10-26 07:02:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by spewing_originality 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That makes two of us thinking people are resolved to answer...not closed...if I may say so...
Sic transit gloria mundi.
2006-10-26 13:34:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Nix 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
right, i too agree with you. you must be truly into philosophy. keen sense of observation.
2006-10-26 06:05:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chief of sinners 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Excellent observation! I agree with you, it cannot.
2006-10-26 05:34:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋