English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The butter/cereal is applied onto the shells of the prawns. Does that mean that the shells are supposed to be eaten too? But I'm sure prawns will taste better without the shells. O_o

2006-10-26 04:55:33 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Dining Out Singapore Hawker Centres

The butter/cereal is applied onto the shells of the prawns. If I remove the shell, the taste of butter/cereal will be lost. Does that mean that the shells are supposed to be eaten too? But I'm sure prawns will taste better without the shells. O_o

2006-10-26 05:00:21 · update #1

9 answers

actually the shells can be eaten as they've been fried to a crisp so it would be very crunchy
taking out the shells may make the prawn too salty as it may get too much of the butter or cereal coating

2006-10-26 04:59:52 · answer #1 · answered by liz c 3 · 1 0

The shells of the prawn can be eaten as it's fried to crisp! AND by right the shells r suppose to taste as nice as the prawn meat becuz there's butter+cereal applied to it! Eat both together! Cuz u'll taste the butter+cereal 1st then the meat(by dis time the butter+cereal taste still lingers). So it's a together thing! If you stillthink it taste better without the shell then there's something wrong with the chef cooking it! BTW i'm a chef trained in 7 diff cuisine, in this case it's chinese cuisine(butter cereal prawn).

2006-10-28 07:26:43 · answer #2 · answered by Ignatius corleone 2 · 0 0

From my point of view...maybe if you remove the shell for butter / cereal prawns the prawn might shrinked into a much smaller size or the prawns might turn too soft of soggy over the heat of the cooking time?... Normally i dun remove the shells with my hands...usually will be using my mouth biting the prawn into pieces so i get to taste the shells but not eating the shells up...that way by the time i eat the flesh it has the butter/ cereal taste...=)

2006-10-27 00:58:16 · answer #3 · answered by EmBelle 2 · 0 0

I think the effect is 2 fold.
Firstly, the restaurants that prepare cereal prawns want to impress the diners by offering larger looking prawns, so the shells are left intact.
Secondly, the juices from the prawn are kept in with the shells. Once you shell the prawns, the dripping, including the butter that oozes from the prawn combine it into a yummy treat!!
Personally, I eat the whole thing, minus the head. The tails are fabulous... crunchy and crisp..!

2006-10-27 02:05:38 · answer #4 · answered by dedoklonk 2 · 0 0

1. Prawn will become smaller when shell is taken out.
2. Without shell, you will eat butter prawn that that taste like butter. With shell, you can eat suck the butter from the shell and at the same time can have the original prawn taste and will offer supreme butter prawn taste.

2006-10-27 08:59:46 · answer #5 · answered by insurebizz 2 · 0 0

You can eat the shells, I do that ! But only for the medium/small prawns, the bigger prawns have harder shells to chew & swallow...

2006-10-26 23:30:05 · answer #6 · answered by Rootbeer 3 · 0 0

liz is right on this - eat with the shells is nice! but i do know of people who leave the shells alone...lol

up to individual's tastes.

2006-10-26 21:44:22 · answer #7 · answered by ash 7 5 · 0 0

No, you can cook them in the shells, but don't eat the shells.

2006-10-26 11:56:48 · answer #8 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 0 0

it is more flavourful this way.

2006-10-27 04:58:21 · answer #9 · answered by Carista W 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers