will they?
2006-10-26 04:35:08 · 2 answers · asked by JokerBlitz 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Probably not. I do not understand why Bush is so committed to them. Isn't he our president first? In the last few years there seems to be this tendancy among Americans to care more and more about what other countries think of us and to do what is in the world's best interest. I am an American first, and I vote for America's interests first. One day when we have solved all of our problems (which is never) then let;s worry about other countries. In the meantime, we need to keep an eye on our enemies and do what we can to ensure the safety of Americans.
2006-10-26 04:38:14 · answer #1 · answered by Average Joe 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course. If they can happen I don't think anyone can dispute it would be better. Unless someone thinks having more support and agreement is a bad thing. If every country was on the same page it would be easier to carry out any resolution. If the U.S. were to go it alone, as they have tried in the past with little success (because North Korea doesn't care about pressure coming from only the U.S.), it is very likely any agreement would be superficial and fail. If we get China and Russia on board will up the possibility of success greatly, because they are who N. Korea relies upon most. N. Korea can not survive in a bubble, and the U.S. is the least of their resources or threats.
Of course, I wouldn't completely shut off bilateral talks, it could help get everyone to the table.
2006-10-26 11:59:14 · answer #2 · answered by straightup 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋