I would never say never. They did it in imagination in "Jurassic Park" so you can figure the desire is there. And a tame, safe, inspirational, educational Jurassic Park within reach of some major Western cities would be a money-spinner. The technical problems are insuperable today, but imagine a world in say 70 years' time with computers 1m or 1bn times faster than today's and I figure they could work out the DNA chain necessary to do it.
2006-10-29 01:12:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by MBK 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
In concept specific. Amber (like interior the movie Jurassic Park) actual can look after mosquito DNA. besides the shown fact that, it in easy terms preserves broken fragments of the DNA. in the event that they might locate sufficient products of amber, and sufficient mosquito fossils with distinctive factors of DNA in, they could be waiting to re-create a strand of DNA using modern-day technologies. and whether they could no longer locate the different factors to make the strand, they might use the DNA from a crocodile or a poultry, as those have close hyperlinks to dinosaurs. After growing to be an entire strand of DNA, they might then might desire to do the approach stated as 'nuclear circulate'. Scientists placed the nuclear of one cellular right into a 2d cellular of the comparable species, after removing the 2d cells nucleus. yet there is no way of amassing a dinosaur egg or their cells to host the recent set of DNA. they might in all likelihood host the 1st cellular interior the cellular of a poultry or a crocodile, yet this might in easy terms be 0.5 a dinosaurs DNA. That leaves what might desire to be the subsequent ideal element to cloning dinosaurs -- cloning extinct mammals, like mammoths. massive fossils are critically youthful than dinosaur fossils. they're in easy terms approximately 30,000 years old. This distinction in age supplies the DNA much less time to decompose. yet a massive cloning venture might nevertheless require a superbly preserved specimen. The massive's tissue could no longer have long previous by using cycles of freezing and thawing or been preserved at quite low temperatures that would desire to harm the DNA. yet, the assumption of piecing mutually this data to get an theory of massive genes isn't thoroughly unreasonable. In 2005, one learn team stated that it had sequenced portion of the massive genome. desire this facilitates
2016-12-28 05:27:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't doubt it. Some scientists are rather very blasphemous. Clones for example. They're already copying life, who's to say they won't recreate it as well?
2006-10-26 04:34:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ravyn 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its impossible.
2006-10-26 04:46:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Joe K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
absotuley not
its just science fiction
2006-10-26 04:30:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by krash 2
·
0⤊
0⤋