She adopted a child that would have otherwise grown up to live a life in poverty, or died at a very young age. Really, who cares what celebrites do. Most of them are stupid or ignorant anyway. How many of them have a university degree? And those that do care about the world, the media always takes the chance to find something wrong with them.
2006-10-26 03:34:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by sangheilizim 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
She most likely got paid big money by some agency that facilitates foreign adoptions. She is has been whore that will do anything for a buck. Hope child has great life. Would like to see fee placed on foreign adoption and money used to help those not adopted in thi country.
2006-10-26 04:34:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mister2-15-2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If what she did was to help a child who would probably die before he was 5 then yes she should be allowed to do it.
Who cares why she did it....the fact is this child will have a much better life with her.
2006-10-26 03:35:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by daljack -a girl 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
50/50 it's good that he has been taken from poverty, but at the end of the day she has 2 wonderful kids, y not let some one else have that privelage
2006-10-26 03:40:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by criddlekellie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
take a child out of a horrific orphanage and give him a really bright future ...donate tons of money locally and help the father,
HOW DARE SHE?!
2006-10-26 03:40:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by macdoodle 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-10-26 22:28:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by acid tongue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
hell yeah, why the hell not???
2006-10-26 03:34:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by JAMES P 2
·
1⤊
0⤋