English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-26 03:31:11 · 7 answers · asked by lliptonteaaddict 1 in News & Events Current Events

7 answers

She adopted a child that would have otherwise grown up to live a life in poverty, or died at a very young age. Really, who cares what celebrites do. Most of them are stupid or ignorant anyway. How many of them have a university degree? And those that do care about the world, the media always takes the chance to find something wrong with them.

2006-10-26 03:34:37 · answer #1 · answered by sangheilizim 4 · 1 0

She most likely got paid big money by some agency that facilitates foreign adoptions. She is has been whore that will do anything for a buck. Hope child has great life. Would like to see fee placed on foreign adoption and money used to help those not adopted in thi country.

2006-10-26 04:34:01 · answer #2 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 0 0

If what she did was to help a child who would probably die before he was 5 then yes she should be allowed to do it.

Who cares why she did it....the fact is this child will have a much better life with her.

2006-10-26 03:35:23 · answer #3 · answered by daljack -a girl 7 · 0 0

50/50 it's good that he has been taken from poverty, but at the end of the day she has 2 wonderful kids, y not let some one else have that privelage

2006-10-26 03:40:28 · answer #4 · answered by criddlekellie 2 · 0 0

take a child out of a horrific orphanage and give him a really bright future ...donate tons of money locally and help the father,
HOW DARE SHE?!

2006-10-26 03:40:00 · answer #5 · answered by macdoodle 5 · 0 0

no

2006-10-26 22:28:53 · answer #6 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0 0

hell yeah, why the hell not???

2006-10-26 03:34:26 · answer #7 · answered by JAMES P 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers