I would not vote for her.
But I don't think she would make it through the primaries anyway... and the Republicans have nothing to do with it. Her fellow Democrats would take great pleasure at pay backs for the Clinton administration. Bill and Hill made quite a few enemies out of their fellow Democrats, they knew they were in the White House and rubbed it in the faces of the ones who were not. All of the innuendo of the 1992 primaries that shadowed Clinton, such as Whitewater, the failed S&Ls they were involved in and campaign donations by Tyson to ignore how they violated every environmental law in the state and ruined several drinking water sources. Plus add Vince Fosters "suicide" and what she knew about Bill's sexual harrassment of employees when he was governor of Arkansas (and she was AG) and you have the meakings for one dirty primary. And none of that includes the White House staffers who threw a party when that administration was over, I'm sure they would have some interesting conversations with other candidate's campaign advisors.
I think her pride says to do it, but I don't believe she will. But if she does she will resign half way through the primaries, in a tearful speech saying she is doing so to protect Chelsea. Candidates enjoy a honeymoon with the press until they get a read on them, but she had her's already as First Lady, the gloves will be off from day one.
2006-10-26 02:55:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I would not, but sometimes I fear Americans are in such need of soap operas and sleazy excitement that they may vote her into the White House. The last time the US was enamoured by a society couple it was the Kennedys.
Then when the Clintons started controversy (yep Hillary tried moving beyond the traditional role of first lady and acted like an elected official with her medical issues), the news reported it. Then it got sleazy with 'ol Bill doing his part and the nation didn't care anymore about foreign policy. Nothing was as exciting as the Clintons, sex, lies and cover-ups.
If Hillary runs, the country will again have Bill in the White House, with a complete role reversal. Ya think Bill will be the ideal person to set the standard for a male first mate, or whatever it will be called? I think asecual Hillary will provide the entertainment by driving the country driectly into the ground, while Bill will provide the social entertainment. Even the tabloids won't be able to keep up with the real thing!
Move over Australia, me and a couple million other Americans make be coming down after election day, 2008!
2006-10-26 02:41:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by stretch 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I do not think she will run as she already has the Repuglican hate machine churning up a lie a minute about her. Rush Limbaugh daily assassinates her character. I would however vote for her, she is a strong, independent woman that is not afraid to stand up for what is right. She is very intelligent and would be able to cope with the pressures of the job. She would have an excellent adviser in her husband, the last legally elected president. He was also the most successful person to hold that job in the last 40 years.
2006-10-26 02:34:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
I'd love her to run. By the time election day comes John McCain and or Rudy would win in a landslide victory against her. Obama has a better shot than she does.
2006-10-26 02:33:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Billary is a socialist who would stick her head in the sand while the islamofascists take over the middle east, then blackmail us with control of world energy supplies, then finish taking power in Europe, since they don't know how to defend themselves without us saving their butts.
2006-10-26 02:36:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by boonietech 5
·
4⤊
0⤋
She'll run , her ego won't let her do anything else .
And she'll lose and blame the voting machines or the vast right wing conspiracy .
2006-10-26 02:41:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
She will run but I think she will lose in the primaries
2006-10-26 02:33:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
There is no one more disengenuous than her, except maybe her husband. No, she could never garner my vote regardless of her opponent.
2006-10-26 02:40:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Wego The Dog 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
She will and no I won't. I'd rather have my teeth pulled. She is a political animal that wants us to live in a "village" and all sing *** bi ya, that is as longs as we sing it her way. My parents and I have fought many wars and lost many friends to defeat socialistic sates. I'll be damn if I want to live in one.
2006-10-26 02:34:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ranger473 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
I would actively campaign AGAINST her. Oh please GOD, no!
2006-10-26 02:32:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by cryllie 6
·
4⤊
1⤋