He says in the paper he wants two ceromonies to crown him King,One in Wesminster Abbey as Head of the Church of England,and another In Paliment Offices for other faiths.Whats wrong with other faiths coming into Westminster after all isnt Christianity supposed to be a tolerant and open faith,Personaly I cant stand either him or his jumped up harlot.
2006-10-26 00:25:40 · 12 answers · asked by Francis7 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Hello Frank,
I think I actually appreciate him as a person. I like his view on farming the organic way, and keeping crops clean of chemicals. I like his view on village living and community's. However I think if you are going to be Head of the Church of England then you should at least agree with the biblical doctrinees set out. Or not do it at all. Christianity should promote free will. But if your not a christian why would you want to take part in a christian service? Your question is shallow on the point of toleration and what that means. I don't think you can understand christian doctrin very well. I spect you will be angry now cos i said you didn't understand. Well I can't help that. Or it could be that you want to provoke Christians to anger. WELL if its the latter BOG TO YOU mwha ha ha ha ha ha Bog isn't that rude though, its not like that Robbie Williams record about rude boxes.
2006-10-26 04:15:27 · answer #1 · answered by : 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I used to be one those people who believed Charles should abdicate for William but after researching and actually finding out Charles has some good qualities to him. I do think he could live longer (he's into health food) and even though I still believe Queen Elizabeth will live another 20 years, Charles will only be 80 and might get to reign 10-20 years. If he is really healthy, he could live long.
P.S. I can't wait until William is king:)
2006-10-26 04:00:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well when and if he becomes king I think he should think of the expense of two coronations. After all the Christian faith accepts all faiths in their churches. If the other do not want to attend then that is their problem. I think all should be invited to Westminster Abbey full stop.
2006-10-26 00:33:58 · answer #3 · answered by London Girl 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The poor man has been emasculated by the women in his life, so he is taking power where ever he can get it.
They should have given him a role and a real job years ago not allowed his brain to rot from false adulation.
Between the idea of him on the throne and George Best on five pound notes, I am so glad I now live in another part of the world.
2006-10-26 01:01:42 · answer #4 · answered by Christine H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think tolerance has been shown over many years but having a seperate ceremony is not the way. Heads of other beliefs should be invited to attend the coronation as perhaps he would be invited a similar ceremony of theirs.
That shows you are open to the idea that other peoples beliefs should be respected, nothing further should be done as it dilutes the importance of the original ceremony.
2006-10-26 00:40:05 · answer #5 · answered by philipscottbrooks 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't see any reason why other faiths shouldn't be invited to westminster abbey I just think he thinks that those of other faiths may not wish to attend an essentially christian cermony (recognising he will rule by the will of god) in a place of christian worship. hey at least he's making an effect and not doing a prince of edinburgh and doing towelhead or slanty eye jokes.
2006-10-26 00:34:21 · answer #6 · answered by blue_cabbage 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Christianity doesn't have a history of tolerance unfortunately. Charlemagne, the Crusades, Henry the 8th, etc. If British society wants to be a tolerant and open society then why does it need royalty at all? Why not create a republic? You might want to see the movie: V for Vendetta.
2006-10-26 00:34:37 · answer #7 · answered by cheyennetomahawk 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree, it would be a really nice mile stone in history if he was crowned and all faiths invited to Westminster.
2006-10-26 00:29:35 · answer #8 · answered by Jenni 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I don't see why he's even talking about it, he'll never be King. Mummy's going for the record. But if he does i don't see the problem with it.
Oh and i quite like him and his jumped up harlot.
If we're talking jumped up harlots we should mention his ex wife (ohh controversial).
2006-10-26 00:29:23 · answer #9 · answered by Georgie's Girl 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Poor ol Charlie , give the guy a break he's ok !
2006-10-26 01:35:21 · answer #10 · answered by nicemanvery 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋