If not, then do you think this world-wide conflict could lead into such war?
Why?
2006-10-24 23:26:46 · 11 answers · asked by davegesprek 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
nope not yet not every one in the world is fighting yet
2006-10-24 23:28:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we may be seeing the 3rd World War coming. But I don't think we are there yet.
I believe that WW III will be a war between religions and that the "front lines" will be different from anything we've ever seen before. I hope I'm so wrong. Peace.
2006-10-24 23:37:25 · answer #2 · answered by superfluity 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This war has a number of countries fighting in it, not all the Worlds countries.
I personally think maybe world war III is an internal battle with ourselves. Looking within and changing the inner world of ourselves to change the outer world.
2006-10-24 23:32:50 · answer #3 · answered by *JC* 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not even close. World War III will come when the Antichrist takes power over the earth. This will come after the rapture of the church.
2006-10-24 23:32:58 · answer #4 · answered by Preacher 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
world war lll has not yet been declared by the countries engaging on a war. Remember that war will only happen if all countries will agree together to enaged war for obvious reason, so do not think that war will happen now
2006-10-24 23:31:59 · answer #5 · answered by Jesus M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I really don't think we are having aWWIII .but these events which are happening at present will most likely lead to another world war.with many nation taking up nuclear technology there is much tension arising around the world.
2006-10-24 23:39:05 · answer #6 · answered by anrx 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer think of Iran could be allowed to enhance nukes. i think of this President lacks the talents to thwart them. All he's conscious of the thank you to do is threaten, coerce, and bomb returned to the stone age. regrettably, he has a militia of arm-chair generals who think of it is largely some worldwide carrying journey and we are #a million! country each and each of how! is what they chant, blog, and drivel. i do no longer think of threatening WW3 is a responsible element to do if the risk of terroist assaults on those seashores is genuine. If GWB have been a real Texan, he might comprehend that Davy Crockett pronounced "First, confirm you're perfect, then, flow forward." He has been incorrect approximately extraordinarily much each little thing, the excuse of "i presumed it became perfect, they informed me it became." is BS, notwithstanding befell to Truman's little table plaque that study The greenback Stops right here? Bush in all risk thought that meant he and his cronies get each and all the conflict plunder and booty.
2016-10-16 09:23:41 · answer #7 · answered by seelye 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. And yes because there are too many key players now which leads to a greater chance of one of them losing control.
2006-10-24 23:31:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not yet, but if global warming is for real, then the seas will rise, the weather will change and there will be famine, pestilence and stuff, lotsa stuff.
war, might well be some of that stuff!!
2006-10-24 23:42:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
TILL WE DONT MEET OUR DEMANDS THE WAR WE WONT STOP THE WAR.HUMAN DEMANDS NEVER STOPS
2006-10-24 23:30:09 · answer #10 · answered by sonubhaiofindia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋