Name a politician up for election on 11/7 of any party thats worth voting for. Why do you think this way? Or any politician already in office serving now?
Please dont nominate your mom for the local school district council either. Sorry, Im sure your mom is just fine. BIG NAMES, BIG RACES, Senate, HoR.
2006-10-24 23:17:48 · 8 answers · asked by LV NASCAR FAN 6 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Joe Lieberman. He has the courage of his convictions and has served honorably and responsibly for many years. He maintains American integrity and morality and serves the American people.
P.S. I'm a Republican and it sickens me to see how he was abused by first, Gore after that election when he supported someone running again Lieberman and than the entire party for deserting him.
Oh well, we are all going to be better off with him in the Senate! Yea!
2006-10-25 00:21:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kinky Friedman - the independent candidate for Governor in Texas. If for no other reason than he stood up in the goobernatorial (i like that) debate wearing a leather vest, a cowboy hat and a cool soul patch amid the brooks brothers suits. AND his main campaign slogan is "why the hell not"
I'm proud to say that I voted yesterday and I did not vote for one single incumbent. Which in this part of texas means I didn't vote for any Republicans.
2006-10-25 00:35:40 · answer #2 · answered by Concerned Citizen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton because she has the stability under pressure to face issues just like what happened during the term of Bill Clinton.
2006-10-24 23:23:38 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there may be some very worth of representing the individuals who choose for them. i think of maximum exchange into capability mad, conceited and self-based. Ted Kennedy became a primary occasion. the individuals of Mass. could have been recommendations ineffective for a era to re-choose for this drunken assassin. i think of in step with risk they have awakened from their stupor and are sending a message now. Edit: term limits seems to fully take greater RIGHTS far flung from the electorate. If initiated, in step with risk do it in yet differently than with the Presidency, and permit them to re-run after one term of "retirement". it is likewise a bummer to income you are able to't vote for somebody you think of is nice for the interest. that consists of the Presidency. however the regulation isn't replaced maximum in all risk and serves a purpose additionally. i do no longer think of ALL incumbents could be voted out unavoidably, yet maximum, in all risk. individually i think of anybody who basically votes occasion Line generally does a disservice to their components.
2016-10-16 09:23:35 · answer #4 · answered by seelye 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obama, because he's a real human being, he cares about people, he doesn't try to lie to us all the time, and he's not a money and power hungary coward, nor does he walk with fools!
2006-10-24 23:25:09 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish I could name one.
2006-10-25 02:56:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
newt.if he runs in 08,i like his christian values and his foreign policy
2006-10-25 02:33:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Me. http://www.edwimmer.com
2006-10-25 01:25:08 · answer #8 · answered by elw 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋