After all we could always go to a morgue and see bodies that are dead there. Truly why would you want to see it or participate in such a hideous event. Isnt creating better? Having fun, laughing with friends, versing having your best friends head blown off while you are watching because you are right next to him in a fox hole?
2006-10-24 22:21:36 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
War should be illegal.
Every war is a civil war in a global village.
It takes a village to raise a child.
Put a motion to world court that war is a crime against humanity have it backed by all un countries that agree and present it to world court and enforce it with the might of the global community at large.
Voice whats in the best interest of the people.
Ob1
2006-10-25 05:40:50 · answer #1 · answered by old_brain 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Unfortunately wars are caused by differences in beliefs and values. If you could get everyone in the world to use the same values you could probably stop war. Past wars were fought so you could have fun and laugh with your friends. Some names of people who truly want war, here are a few, Osama Binladen, Saddam Hussein, Adolph Hitler,Momar Kadafi, the list goes on and on. You either fight them or submit to them. I don't know about you but I will never submit.
2006-10-25 15:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by tim b 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I agree with you on some points but not completely. VS MORALES. In their first fight, it's true that Morales outboxed Pacquiao and won convincingly. This is because Morales is a great boxer himself. But I also think Paqcuiao was badly bothered by the cut in his eye which is why he didn't really perform that well. But still the credit is for Morales because that cut is caused by a punch. In their 2nd & 3rd fight, I agree that Morales was past his prime but still a strong fighter. But even in his prime, I would still think that Pacquiao would beat Morales but it will be a close fight though. VS MARQUEZ: In their first fight, I thought Marquez got lucky to even got a draw. It should have been a win for Pacquiao coz the judge who scored the fight even scored the 1st round to be 10-7 when it should've been 10-6 because of the 3 knockdowns. The judge honestly admitted his mistake after the fight. In their second fight, I also thought Marquez won by 1 point. However, some rounds are so close that it can go either way. So I can't blame the judges if they score some rounds to Pac rather than JMM. VS BARRERA: It's true Pac fought a battle worn Barrera. But you can't deny he's still a good boxer at that time. In fact, after the loss to Pac, he even beat Morales. And Morales, after the loss to Barrera, beat Pac. Hard to say that Morales & Barrera are 2 wornout fighters when they fought Pac. VS: HATTON: It's true Hatton is not the elite fighter like Morales, Barrera & Marquez but he is on top of the Junior Welterweight division when Pac beat him. His only loss came from the former P4P king and their fight was not in Junior Welter. And Pac is fighting in Junior welter for the first time. To win the fight so convincingly against Hatton is a huge feat. VS DELA HOYA: Dela Hoya is indeed past his prime when he fought with Pac. But for me, the main reason he lost is he had the wrong game plan. He underestimated Pac too much that he thinks he can overpower him with his size. But if he played a different game plan, i would say Dela Hoya might even win that fight (in his prime).
2016-03-28 06:58:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one likes war.
Unfortunately wars need to be fought so freedom loving people and countries can live in peace and make their own choices, instead of letting dictators and terrorists make decisions for them.
Many have seen loved ones die and mates have seen thier mates die along side of them in wartime.
They grieve and never forget but they move on in life there are still people around who love you.
We always hear of how many died but look at the other side many came home.
Many people would rather have security than freedom, it is called the slave mentality.
Take care!
2006-10-25 00:15:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The point is that even if I wanted, I couldn't engineer one.
We need to find this out from those kings, ministers, governors, elected representatives etc.(and not the least from the likes of Mr Bush) who wage wars and perhaps multiply money and power for themselves!!
2006-10-25 02:10:54 · answer #5 · answered by small 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nobody likes wars & dead bodies. The men who are hungry & want more power, want wars to fulfil their wishes at the expense of others.
2006-10-25 05:42:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
To some people , especially who have better technology with them, war seems to be a very quick means of ensuring a lasting peace amongst the 'left-overs' !
2006-10-25 06:08:45 · answer #7 · answered by Spiritualseeker 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
My answer my dear, is my opinion, others may have their own.
I do not like war nor want to see it anywhere.
I do not like to see bodies with out the person in them.
Although, there is a time and place for everything.
2006-10-25 00:30:18 · answer #8 · answered by ShinningStar 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
yeh wars r kinda stupid but....the world needs leaders
2006-10-24 23:28:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋