English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
11

Which do you think is the better among the two? State reasons to justify your answer.

2006-10-24 20:03:21 · 16 answers · asked by Ricky the Kid 4 in Sports Wrestling

16 answers

WWE - when tna is not on
TNA - when wwe is not on

2006-10-24 20:09:50 · answer #1 · answered by Taylor2k 2 · 1 0

WWE because WWE is more established than TNA.WWE has been around for a long time and TNA just started a few years back.WWE wrestlers are way more better than TNA.TNA does have some talented wrestlers but not as many as WWE.

2006-10-25 06:36:40 · answer #2 · answered by WWE Champ 5 · 1 0

WWE Because I never Seen TNA I don't Even Know When It Is On TV

2006-10-25 04:43:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

TNA = Professional wrestling

WWE = Sports Entertainment

I personally think TNA is a whole lot better then WWE, at least I could watch a full impact episode unlike Smackdown. If you have not seen TNA wrestling watch one of their PPVs.

2006-10-25 12:00:56 · answer #4 · answered by HGonz 2 · 1 0

TNA is better at showing the matches than the WWE. The WWE is better in presenting morons as champions. TNA is kind of entertaining because of the wrestling. The WWE has both `entertainment` and wrestling. But it doesnt entertain me. My number one choice is TNA i guess.

2006-10-25 05:19:39 · answer #5 · answered by DARIA. - JOINED MAY 2006 7 · 1 0

wwe is a lot better than tna.

2006-10-25 06:39:48 · answer #6 · answered by shelley L 1 · 1 0

WWE is full of new stars but they have no talent and most of the story lines are old.

TNA has better wrestlers and is building new talent like AJ Styles,Abyss and many more,it also has old classics like Jeff Jarret and sting

2006-10-25 12:10:42 · answer #7 · answered by HHH 6 · 1 0

WWE, i've never seen tna.

2006-10-25 05:01:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anna 2 · 1 0

i like both coz tna has good wrestlers wwe hv good storylines so thts y

2006-10-25 03:39:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

WWE IS LONGER SO ITS BETTER BUT TNA HAS GREAT TALENT AND I PERSONALLY THINK ITS HELLA SLOWLY RISING IN LEVEL TO TAKE A STAB AT WWE BUT IT WILL FAIL CAUSE THEY CANT EVEN AFFORD TO TOUR ALL YEAR. yep

2006-10-25 04:02:44 · answer #10 · answered by Matthew Shlmn 5 · 1 0

wwe... you get bored watching tna

2006-10-25 04:29:31 · answer #11 · answered by d.t. 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers