2006-10-24 17:37:36 · 8 answers · asked by matt s 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
You're asking whether to believe in something based on evidence, fossils, and athropological observations or something without one scintella of evidence except faith.... hmmm, i pick the rational choice...but that's just me.
2006-10-25 04:46:00 · answer #1 · answered by Its not me Its u 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
this question has been only posed a few hundred times but my answer is still the same Darwin was honest , a non existant God never spoke he was recorded by liars posessed with the religious fervor and spiritually justifiable falsehood to manipulate for the greater good ......I'll forego either as relevant to my life!
2006-10-24 17:48:19 · answer #2 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe that neither contradicts the other; creation does not mean the exclusion of evolution.
2006-10-24 17:39:12 · answer #3 · answered by Yacine B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i don't see how evolution could just happen.
i think evolution is a form of intellegent design.
i've got a useful link if you want to check it out
2006-10-24 17:46:26 · answer #4 · answered by Chemical Coltraine 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
god created evolution and Darwin to talk about it
2006-10-24 17:48:28 · answer #5 · answered by ceesteris 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
evolution
2006-10-24 17:45:33 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
evolution
2006-10-24 17:39:02 · answer #7 · answered by L.J. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The two are not mutually exclusive.
2006-10-25 06:58:51 · answer #8 · answered by dunno 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋