there is no weapon,no blood,no pictures of the wound and also the victems left the area of th crime to go later to someone elses house and start a fight there then call the the police and tell them they where attacked somewhere else
2006-10-24 16:37:24 · 8 answers · asked by soldierofyah7 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Three witnesses if credible are enough to convict a suspect as long as the crime will be proved by other circumstantial evidence.
2006-10-24 16:40:09 · answer #1 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Making an arrest and laying charges can be done on a statement. Of course getting a conviction in court is another matter. That would require evidence and testimony before there is an conviction.
2006-10-24 23:41:54 · answer #2 · answered by Kenneth H 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Should you be able to, NO
Can they, yes alot of times people can be convicted on less than enough evidence if a jury beleives it and the judge allows it.
Time for an attorney
2006-10-24 23:41:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on all the facts, but yes, you can convict someone on witness statements only.
2006-10-24 23:46:39 · answer #4 · answered by sfcjcl 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, you can and will be convicted unless you have a damn good mouth piece and money to hire investigators, etc, one witness is more than sufficient, most of the time only a complaint filed against you . and if you have a record period, kiss your *** good bye
2006-10-24 23:45:07 · answer #5 · answered by jim ex marine offi, 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jose, you are in deep hot water, you need to hire an attorney.
2006-10-24 23:39:56 · answer #6 · answered by escapingmars 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Three staements? Yea...As long as they can prove where they were.
2006-10-25 14:03:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
who cares? you half gave the truth- unless you give the rest-we can't answer you.
2006-10-24 23:46:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋