English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Read this excerpt on divorce rates. What's your take on why there's so much more divorce in areas where 'traditional values' are supposedly higher?

"Massachusetts does indeed have the lowest divorce rate among all 50 states. Born-again Christians have among the highest divorce rates.

The Associated Press, using data supplied by the US Census Bureau, found that the highest divorce rates are to be found in the Bible Belt. The AP report stated that "the divorce rates in these conservative states are roughly 50 percent above the national average of 4.2 per thousand people." The 10 Southern states with some of the highest divorce rates were Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas. By comparison nine states in the Northeast were among those with the lowest. divorce rates: Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont."

2006-10-24 16:27:50 · 3 answers · asked by nora22000 7 in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

People at least get married in Vermont!

2006-10-26 05:31:50 · update #1

3 answers

You misunderstand. Republo-fascist rules are to control other people. They have no interest in controlling themselves.

2006-10-24 16:32:02 · answer #1 · answered by Hate Boy! 5 · 1 0

it is amazingly awesome, in the start look, yet i imagine this is an get mutually of why statistics are unreliable. For an get mutually, there's a historic correlation between wealthy/caucasian neighborhoods, and poor/minority neighborhoods interior of reach. it is because in the "old days", the wealthy had servants, and the servants necessary to stay close to their jobs, so little ghettoes formed close to mansions, yet with truly some "obstacles" in the variety of large roads, railroad tracks, cul-de-sacs, and so on. voting lists are literally not truly representative of the overall inhabitants, a minimum of no longer in the country. What does it take to categorise an finished state? fifty one% of the voters? at the same time as A and B correlate, both A motives B (particularly, because this is no longer over even 70%), or B motives A, or both A and B have exterior motives that reason both one in each and every of them, and many different consequences. statistics not in any respect provide all of us a reason-and-result photo. not in any respect. "Blue" households are operating- and center- type persons. they have continually had the bottom start expenditures, ever when you consider that each and every time. With a lot less money, and having to pay their personal way, they are very careful about marriage and making children ensue. the wealthy can arise with the money for surplus children, and the poor those days have authorities help that makes more advantageous youthful ones "tolerable". (?) Or, in the distant previous, they could no longer arise with the money for abortions, birth control, and so on. (In economics, the human sexchronic might want to be seen an rigid curve, a consistent aspect in human life, without or with present day birth control approaches.) So NO conclusions might want to be drawn. human beings those days are outright manipulated by technique of statistics, which in difficulty-free words have a tendency to expose that seven out of ten is 70%. There are "lies, damn lies, and statistics." :-)

2016-12-05 05:05:37 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because the blue states are mostly gay, where it is illegal to marry

by the way... vermont? that's about the worst place to live by any means. if you read the laws in that state they are horrendous....

2006-10-24 16:32:34 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers