I disagree. I think US troops are just wishing people like you would shut up for awhile.
2006-10-24 15:59:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
3⤋
What I clearly don't understand is does anyone really believe that Iraq or the middle east is close to being in a state of peace???? We have been there 3 to 4 years and we are in the same state as when we started.
2006-10-24 16:12:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Y 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
when did he quit? he has never told the truth about the iraq thing before why do you think he would start now. also look for a draft to be iniated after the first of the year. he can not keep adding numbers to iraq without getting men some way and they sure will not be volenteering like he is going to be needing.
2006-10-24 16:10:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by roy40372 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
actually the big picture is ...we will never bring peace to the middle east,we will never "win" this war in iraq,we are and invading force that has subjected the iraqi civilian to living in a war zone (you have to be completely insane to think that they are better off,or that they appreciate being invaded and subjecting them to...well like i said a war zone) the big picture is we are going to lose a lot more of our soldiers are young and brave and best in a war that we cannot possibly win,the big picture is that daily our war escalates the muslim hatred towards the west it is actually a war against the muslim world (or they certainly feel that way) the big picture is that it is a sham by your beloved bush to make him and his cronies a quick buck and leave it to the next guy to deal with.
2006-10-24 16:17:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by seth s 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Staying the course means fulfilling the initial goal: bringing peace , stabily and democracy to the Middle East. Adding or removing soldiers has nothing to do with the overall plan. You need to get the big picture.
2006-10-24 16:07:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by jinxter469 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Are you kidding? This is what could finally bring our troops home. Instead of patrolling certain areas, with more troops, they could do multiple swooping raids and catching these insurgents and ending the war quicker and also getting our troops out of fire. This could finally bring the end of the war before the next election
2006-10-24 16:00:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
no longer something incorrect with self assurance. on the time he had no thought that he could be at conflict forign terrorists and the american liberal device considering almost each dem grew to become into casting their carry em on votes in prefer of the conflict. the army that he grew to become into refering to grew to become into disposed of in a rely of weeks. the terrorists that should have attacked us right here have been completely silenced. the insurgents who resent our combating them killing one yet another and american liberals are the only enimies left. that's complicated to calculate what share iraqis and individuals could have died if no longer for his formidable action so supported by way of maximum all people on the time. interesting that he by no skill recieved any public critisism for this assertion till he apoligized for having made it. it aws in responce to the set up question of "what blunders have you ever made..". the 1st time he grew to become into asked this he pronounced that he thought that he have been doing nicely and the media had a feild day. whilst asked lower back and he got here up with something the "on your faceing" began. it doesnt rely what he says or does, the liberal device will oppose it. they dont even know what their own positions are till they hear what his are, then they oppose. if bush comes to a decision that winning the iraq conflict grew to become into adequate and we can loosen up on the conflict on terror and initiate off bringing troops domicile they're all arranged to assert "yet we mandatory to initiate the draft, boost the troops and win the conflict on terror", if he increaces the troops of direction they're waiting with all the blood for oil talk. and of direction the worst selection could be to stay the direction. in reality i dont know for valuable if republicans could act any greater effective if a democrat made such an apolige. i dont think we can ever know.
2016-11-25 19:22:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yup drinking again i hear-ed and weeds too always happy the s.o.b i think he drinks bcoz he is sad counting troops body bags that arrive everyday from Iraq
2006-10-24 16:10:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes he could be very well drinking again!
The Iraqis have 300,000 troops, they can run their own nation.
2006-10-28 08:21:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Villain 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
that's like asking Adolph Hitler the invasion plans for Europe!!! is the pathetic plan working yet,i haven't seen his popularity go up yet?
2006-10-24 15:58:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋