In the Final Destination series, why didnt "fate" strike them all down with a heart attack or similar. I know it wouldnt have made much of a movie... but be honest... Do you really think that they were good in the first place?
2006-10-24 15:30:39 · 17 answers · asked by shevlad2004 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
The angel of darkness is not kind at heart and was pissed off that the characters ruined its design, so it wanted to strike fear into the hearts and minds by killing them in torturous grusome ways ... just my thought on that but im not death so i wouldnt know
2006-10-24 15:37:04 · answer #1 · answered by FireDemon 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they were just basically made for entertainment purposes only, some of the deaths were impossible. i watched the 3rd one not that long ago and i thought it was a great movie and just little far fetched like some of the deaths couldn't happen like they did, as in such case a the tanning bed the tanning salons don't have two tanning beds in the same room. so i don't try to put any logic behind these movies because there is none and i just want to get entertained so, they deliver that.
2006-10-25 06:39:04 · answer #2 · answered by jay lang 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've only seen the third one... I get scared easily but this didn't scare me much at all. It made me a lot more aware of my surroundings though lol and besides a heart attack is boring compared what worse things could happen. If you wanted to kill someone and actually did....would you make them have a simple heart attack? I wouldn't....I'd probably bleed them to death or something...
2006-10-24 15:44:00 · answer #3 · answered by Sarah 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I lurveee Final Destination 1 + 2 + 3... not sure which is my favourite though but i'd probably say 2.. when that pole goes through that girl in the car.. not nice lol... but 3 is mint coz of the rollercoaster imagine that really happening... talk about sh*tin it! lol
2006-10-24 21:21:52 · answer #4 · answered by a$#!£y 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just saying in the first final destination in the premonition it actually doesn't show how Todd died it just shown him getting hit on the head by a radio and then the explosion.
2015-08-17 03:10:38 · answer #5 · answered by Dafydd 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like all that Final Destinations but my fav has gotta be 3. Dont think i'll ever go on a rollercoaster again!!
2006-10-24 22:26:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
part 2 and 3 were better than part 1 but thats how they make that money, its like in a horror flick, when the girls running and stops to see if hes still behind her, we're like Keep Runing girl, but then he gets her out of no where. But i love movies, theyve made plenty of money off me, i buy 1 a week.lol
2006-10-24 15:34:05 · answer #7 · answered by nicky l 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first one was good if only for the bus death - the first time I saw that it was great. The next two were... less than good. And apparently Death is creative as hell - and heart attacks aren't creative. Usually.
2006-10-24 15:34:38 · answer #8 · answered by over_educated_under_everything 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they're ok but a bit overrated (like the saw films) - i did like the second one, that was good - the first one was a bit naff and by the third the whole thing had been done to death (no pun intended).
if you think about it it's gotta be a pretty disturbed mind who puts all these scenarios together that lead to such gruesome deaths.
2006-10-24 19:51:59 · answer #9 · answered by Kerri 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I like the first and last installments. The idea is original. They're not as good as the Saw movies but they're entertaining.
2006-10-24 15:34:52 · answer #10 · answered by Nuseed 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋