English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Pro-Lifers say "Abortion is murder", Pro-Choicers do not see it as murder. Homicide is the act of killing a human being. The Zygote, Embyro or Fetus is a living being with it's own unique Human DNA set. So to terminal the pregnancy is to removal of the Zygote, Embyro or Fetus, that is not likely to survive or the abortion procedure would terminate the human being-life of the Zygote, Embryro or Fetus.
For all intents and purposes abortion is indeed a homicide.

2006-10-24 14:31:38 · 27 answers · asked by Gardenfoot 4 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

27 answers

I do not know anyone who went through an abortion, but I do not think it is a question for a man to ask unless he performs regularly without protection. This is a free country. What most people do, they have to live with--the good and the bad. If God can forgive them, then I am noone to judge.
Homicide---it depends on the situation and circumstances.

2006-10-24 14:45:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

on the same time as there ought to be applicable settlement with aborting undesirable fertilized eggs starting to be interior your womb, the word 'Justifiable homicide' seems intense, as does, 'by way of any degree.' some 'measures,' are risky to the well-being of the female, or baby woman, wherein case that's extra effective to no longer proceed. secure measures, are mandatory. homicide assumes which you're killing no depend if justifiable or no longer, that's a mistake. it is the comparable form of questioning that condemns adult adult males for 'dropping their seed' while they masturbate. Abortion isn't killing, that's the top of yet another unsuccessful egg. merely like the masses of thousands of unsuccessful sperizoids that on no account attain an egg. additionally, the belief supplies extra fee to the egg than to the female.. loads of years have long gone into the existence of the female, so, this investment ought to be regarded after as heavily as a danger. on the comparable line, any choose who disagrees with abortion ought to be legally and financially in charge for the welfare of any undesirable new child that ought to to no longer have had to go through being born without his, infrequently her, criminal interference. even nevertheless, there's a great distinction between the disappearance of an unknown, undeveloped existence, and the removal from society of a maladjusted socially-unept attacker. the flair new child would instruct to be a exhilaration. The attacker is a costlly danger to women and the completed society.

2016-12-08 20:42:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The truth is, at conception, that single celled person contains his or her full complement of DNA (everything the full grown adult will be).
Let me give you the answer from a "Bible Thumper":
While the Constitution guarantees the right to life and liberty to every person, the Supereme Court decreed that an unborn child is not a person, and in 1973 abortion was legalized. Since then, there have been millions upon millions of abortions and it is now the most frequently performed "operation" in the U.S. Just because something is legal, does that make it moral? While the Supreme Court doesn't see an unborn baby as a person, does God?
-"For Thou didst form my inward parts; Thou didst weave me in my mother's womb" (Psalm 139:13).
-"And now says the Lord, who formed Me from the womb to be His Servant, to bring Jacob back to Him" (Isaiah 49:5).
-"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, and before you were born I consecrated you; I have appointed you a prophet to the nations" (Jeremiah 1:5).
-"For he will be great in the sight of the Lord, and he will drink no wine or liquor; and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit, while yet in his mother's womb" (Luke 1:15).
-"But when He who had set me apart, even from my mother's womb, and called me through His grace" (Galatians 1:15).
The Bible makes it clear that an unborn baby is a person who is known by God. Besides the emotional, phychological, and physical complications that are so often connected with abortion, in the eyes of God, it is the murder of an innocent human being.
I have to agree with the bumper sticker I saw not too long ago: "As a former fetus, I oppose abortion." What if the mother of Noah, Abraham, or Moses would have had an abortion? What if the mother of Jesus would have had an abortion?
God is definitely pro-life... are you?

2006-10-25 11:55:45 · answer #3 · answered by Questioner 7 · 1 1

Abortion is not murder. Is using a condom or birth control murder because you're killing a potential human there. It is not a human until it is born. If there was a burning building would you rather save a baby or 15 test tubes of Embryos. I think abortion is wrong because it is an irresponsible decision. I think women should have the baby unless they are raped or something. Theres always contraceptives. But pretty much since I don't have a vagina like the rest of you people I could care less if its legal or not.

2006-10-25 09:24:34 · answer #4 · answered by bob john 1 · 0 2

Abortion is not an issue this election year. Republicans will down play abortion now and in the future as they will need embryonic stem cells in the future for curing diseases. I've never known a Republican that can turn down the an opportunity to make money in the medical field.

Pro-lifers are going to have to ask themselves this tough question, "if my family or myself could be cured of a terminal illness, would we accept treatment made possible from embryonic stem cells." Would you?

2006-10-24 14:39:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

A fetus is a glorified parasite. It lives by sucking the life out of a host. That host is a woman and has a right to her body. It is her choice to make not yours. Though I don't like abortion, as it costs me potential workers. Still it's her choice.
Though it is murder. Shows humanity needs to evolve a little more.

2006-10-24 14:44:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

partical birth abortion maybe but if the embryo hasn't progress to the fetus, stage then they only thing being removed from the body is a cluster of cell that my still be naturally aborted by the body. I'm not saying that i agree with abortion, but the right to your body and health is something that no one (especially the government) should tell me what to do.

2006-10-24 14:43:46 · answer #7 · answered by kat 2 · 1 2

I agree with you, abortion is, and has always been, murder.
Some facts about abortion:...
--over 48,000,000 babies have been killed since 1973.
--4,000 babies are aborted each day
--4,000 women are emotionally traumatized each day
If we rid of the pro-choice law, I believe it will not stop, but at least help rid of casual sex and one-nighters. It's easy to do something like that knowing that there are no consequences. And I understand if a woman has been raped and is therefore pregnant not by choice, either. but that still doesn't give the mother the right to abort her unborn child, as the old saying goes, "two wrongs don't make a right."

2006-10-24 14:42:27 · answer #8 · answered by Dinosaur 4 · 3 3

I think abortion is murder. A baby is a life even if it's not completely formed. Abortion is basically keeping a baby from being born/given life. Isn't that murder? I think the baby actually even looks like a baby when abortion takes place...I'm not completely sure though. Try looking at pregnancy care center's website. There's some good info there.

2006-10-24 14:38:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

You asked a question and then answered it yourself..

Though, after thinking about it for the long time, I think the most reasonable proposal is to make abortion illegal after the fetus has developed brain cells.

2006-10-24 14:40:05 · answer #10 · answered by thalog482 4 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers