2006-10-24 13:31:16 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
It's a lie and technically libel.
Is THAT ok? No.
2006-10-25 09:46:40 · answer #1 · answered by RAR24 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow like this is something new? Remember Gerry Studds? I bet you don't your homosexual democratic congressman wasn't too good either if you remember. Funny thing is nothing happened to him and he stayed in office. So now that a republican messes up it is now beyond newsworthy and we call for his head. Hear is what Gerry Studds did: "Studds was censured by the House for having sexual relations with the page. He acknowledged having sex with a 17-year-old male page in 1973 and making sexual advances to two others and admitted an error in judgment, but did not apologize."
Sex with a minor makes you a rapist, a pedophile, and a criminal; but since he was a democrat and we don't want to upset his husband we just ignore it.
2006-10-26 21:25:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure it is ok he is a Republican so he can do what he wants and not answer to anyone for it and besides it gives the Missouri people the chance to get in line an support the gay marriage issue in their state. But at the least he shall have the support of the moral minority.
2006-10-24 21:22:04 · answer #3 · answered by billc4u 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No it is not, our government has had a melt of morals and it is time for a clean sweep of them all. The only reason he came out is so when the story is told it wont seem like he was hiding anything. I think they call it reverse physiology. He must really think the people of missouri a dump.
2006-10-24 20:52:39 · answer #4 · answered by carla b 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, that is what is wrong with this country now, acceptance of deviantcy!!wrong is wrong!he cheated on his wife even if it was with a man? cant yu see what is happening to the moral fiber of this country? must be something with Republicans??first Foley now this perp? Ronnie is spinning in his tomb!!
2006-10-24 21:01:23 · answer #5 · answered by richard c 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Definitely not, he cheated, he shouldn't get anything out of a divorce, should he get one. People that do that kind of thing should be voted out.
But nobody asked you, now did they answerman?
2006-10-27 17:40:44 · answer #6 · answered by The Crow 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i never heard anything like that...sounds like a made-up story...i do know he was in jack abramoff's hip pocket, bought and paid for...and doesn't mind exaggeration, false attribution of qoutes, and out and-out bs in his campaigns...typical slimy politician...
2006-10-24 21:19:02 · answer #7 · answered by spike missing debra m 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
of course its OK to apologize for past transgressions...at least he admits it and wants to move on to the future and not ponder on the past...
2006-10-24 21:20:47 · answer #8 · answered by turntable 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Truer words were never spoken, all repuglicans are pretty sorry if you ask me.
2006-10-24 21:03:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
where is your link or proof?
2006-10-24 20:37:51 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋