either of them performed partivcularly well, but i believe Bledsoe is not the answer. I mean cmon Buffalo got rid of his butt and he might be best to retire. I also believe the O-line has major problems.......whart r your thoughts..
2006-10-24 12:40:57 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
The O-line was the heart of the problems. However, Bledsoe is what he is, a good quarterback with protection, and a horrible QB without protection. Since the O-line is the bigger issue Bledsoe is done... Romo, should have started the regular season... we didn't need 6 games to know that Drew Bledsoe is an average QB... imagine if Romo had started the season... they'd probably be 3-3; last night's would have been a lot closer; and there'd be hope in Big D that the 'boys were about to go on a run. As it stands they'll probably lose next week against Carolina, but win both the 'skins & Cards games... putting them at 5-4 going into their home game against Indy... with 4-5 winable games after that. Instead they got this QB contraversy stuck right in the middle of the season with a big game against Carolina coming up... dropping to 3-4 with a rookie QB isn't so bad... Putting a rattled Drew Bledsoe back in after getting hanked he's gonna play scared and spoil any chance of saving the season. (Probably setting off another T.O. tornado in the process) Overall, Romo is the best choice right now. It should have happened in August, but we'll take right now and take heart that there's some hope in the QB with more mobility and excited to be in the game.
2006-10-24 13:00:13 · answer #1 · answered by Chi1linVi1lain 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They will probably win about the same amount of games with either one at the helm. Romo will cost them some games because of inexperience and Bledsoe will cost them some games because the man can not side-step dripping molasses at the North Pole. The Big Tuna could just no longer stomach Drew Bledsoe throwing so many picks in the red zone... now he will get to watch Romo do it! The truth is it is not about the QB's in Dallas.. The offensive line is Swiss cheese baby! I would have kept Larry Allen and maybe helped Julius Jones have a few 100 yard games this year... it is hard to make teams pay for blitzing you when they know you can't run the ball. Hey, it was a mistake to pull Bledsoe... it was 12-7 at the half... not 30-7! Tuna is GW Bush.... he knows that he won't be back!
2006-10-24 19:47:04 · answer #2 · answered by No More 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the big Tuna might have messed up when he went with Romo over Bledsoe in the second half. Bledsoe isn't bad enough to bench yet. Romo came out and threw and INT first thing!
I do have to say though that now the decision has been made that they need to stick with Romo so he can get the experience he needs.
Questions is where does Bledsoe go next cause yo know he isn't going to stick around and be a back up.
2006-10-24 19:43:20 · answer #3 · answered by Diggs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Bledsoe should have been pulled at the half but now that he has been they might as well go with Romo. He threw interceptions, which is what Bledsoe had going against him. But at least with Romo in there, the offense can try to do more. Teams can't sent those all out blitzes up the middle anymore since Romo is mobile. And now that they don't have to max protect every down, more recievers (especially Whitten) can now go out in routes.
So there's still the threat of turnovers but I still think that Romo gives the offense more versatility which should give opposing defenses a little bit more of a challenge.
2006-10-24 19:48:50 · answer #4 · answered by Pablo M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The o line is the problem! If I was the coach I would go with Romo just because he can move around more then Bledsoe.
2006-10-24 19:44:32 · answer #5 · answered by justcurious 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with parcels decision to take bledsoe out i think he was overlooking the real problem which is the offensive line not the qb. No one know's how romos gonna do but i think at this point parcels has to stick with romo, what's that old saying "you made your bed, now lie in it" for better or worse, romos finishing up the season
2006-10-24 19:53:26 · answer #6 · answered by kristen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
everyone who says the offensive line is the problem are a bunch of idiots. it goes deeper than that. the defense knows bledsoe isn't going anywhere so that's why they blitz and that's why it seems to be "the problem". when you get a qb that can move they won't be so aggresive. the offensive scores plenty of points. the defensive gives up too much. i think they need new safteys. a 5th round starting rookie and roy williams who can't even cover a tight end won't cut it.
2006-10-24 21:40:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that The Tuna really messed up benching Bledsoe in front of his fans. Not only that Romo messed up too. I really think the the BIG TUNA needs to be benched ! If not there is not going to be any play offs for the Cow girls. OOPPS "I meant the Cowboy's !" He He !!
2006-10-24 20:24:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
stick with Bledsoe
2006-10-25 02:48:13 · answer #9 · answered by John71 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they should us romo more because he is better than bledsoe because he is faster then Bledsoe
2006-10-24 20:14:55 · answer #10 · answered by steven a 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋