English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence_(Average_gaps_among_races)#Brain_size_.26_structure

2006-10-24 11:46:59 · 33 answers · asked by Dr Feel 1 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

Their brains are between the size of a normal human and a monkey...what a surprise :)

2006-10-24 11:49:52 · update #1

Blacks are the least evolved race, so they still look and act like monkeys

Asians & Whites are the most evolved & look nothing like a monkey

2006-10-24 11:52:17 · update #2

another source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craniometry#Racial_difference_in_brain_size

2006-10-24 11:55:08 · update #3

33 answers

There are a whole lot of things that i can say about a Racist, Cracker, Pig,White Devil like your self, but my mother taught me better than that......

2006-10-24 11:55:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

There is no such concept as "evolutionary superior" in biology. And like virtually all present day evolutionary biologists I would fircely deny that any one human "race" (whatever that is supposed to mean) is superior to any other. However, it is true that Darwin believed that white (specifically English) people were better than other people. This has nothing to do with his theory of evolution, however: it was the standard assumption of 19th century white men. For a typical example of such attitudes: "I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races - that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the ***** should be denied everything." Guess who?

2016-03-28 06:32:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

...and did u know that ur Question is 20% dumber than all the others on this forum? What we thought we knew back then is not what we know now...so stay stuck in the 1800s...u probably still think the world is flat...wow, evolution skipped your slow dumb behind...read plenty of books, u'll learn plenty my dear, but also learn to differentiate fiction from truth...that's what our brains are for....

2006-10-24 12:05:53 · answer #3 · answered by SUGA 3 · 1 0

And did you know that Black brains are more dense and relatively have larger neurons than White brains? So whats the difference? We all are basically equal in some fashion. There are smart White people and smart Black people. Then there are dumb White people and dumb Black people.

2006-10-24 12:00:04 · answer #4 · answered by David S 1 · 0 0

You're basing this statement off a guy who took measurements in 1839. Okay. Who's got the smaller brain now Dr. Phil?

2006-10-24 11:50:07 · answer #5 · answered by *Cara* 7 · 2 1

First of all, that's a little racist and second of all that's not a fact! Be careful what you research over the internet, because 99% of the things on the net are not true.

2006-10-24 11:52:03 · answer #6 · answered by Shorty 1 · 0 1

and yet did you know that none of us (except genius exceptions like einstein) use more than 2% of our brain on the average day? therefore it makes very little difference since none of us are using anywhere near the capacity we have.
and obviously this wasn't an average day for you since you were using about 0.0% of your brain when you posted this question...hmm.

2006-10-24 11:56:26 · answer #7 · answered by sky_blue 2 · 1 0

I don't believe that, your source is wikipedia.

there's only once exception for having a small brain:

being a Nazi, that's like having no brain at all

2006-10-24 11:50:47 · answer #8 · answered by natalia k 7 · 2 0

Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, so I wouldn't put much stock in its information...also the site you found clearly states that other research has not substantiated these results.

2006-10-24 11:51:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Wikipedia isn't a good source. Anyway, even if it were true, it wouldn't matter because brain size has nothing to do with anything. Find it somewhere else, or be content with lies.

2006-10-24 11:49:47 · answer #10 · answered by Dancer 3 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers