Tired of the same Abortion argument?

Question

I'm tired of the republican's god arguement and even the arguements that involve all the well researched info on what parts of the body are grown and so on. And i'm deffinetly tired of the libral's 'that poor female' speeches about a friend of a friend's cousin's step sister's perdicament.

In the end i believe it's just plain wrong to kill your child no matter how he or she came about. The funny part is librals are the ones more famous for being pro-choice unless the woman's choice is to be pro-life and worry about a mental person trying to kill their child. Its also funny that usually librals are the ones all up in arms about human rights(like w prisoners in iraq that tried to kill our soldiers), but apartently that doesn't count to librals if a girl doesn't feel like taking on responsibility.

So give it to me... SHORT and sweet...

i know i didn't cover all the arguements, theres only so much room they give you and it part of the question for you.

A person below said: "Girl take responsibility? You want to force a 16 year old to have a baby for no legitimate reason, and then you don't want to support them when they do!"

~Yes i do. she thought she was grown enough for sex then she must have thought she was grown enough to have children. your just plain stupid if you think that your not gonna get pregnant if you performing the exact action that causes pregnancy. And i will gladly pay more taxes so that she can get welfare for her LIVING child.

Answer 1

In short - when "ProAbortion" became "ProChoice" - I could see the spin masters at work - lots of positive spin in that euphemism.
No one wants to be labeled as someone who doesn't want people to have freedom of choice for themselves - I just never quite got the giant leap from your personal freedom of choice to your freedom to abort someone else.

Answer 2

Basically the argument comes down to a foetus rights versus a womans rights. Most people - in the UK at least would say that a woman's rights take president over that of a foetus's at least up until the foetus is about 3 months. It is a womans body, having a child will affect the rest of her life. Don't blame the women - it takes two to make a baby! Yet women are usually the ones who take responsibility for what to do next if an accident occurs. Women are the ones who take on the responsibility for terminating their pregnancy, seeing as it is their body - that is their right. It is very strange to expect the rights of a young foetus to take president over that of a developed human. That is not to say that every effort should not be taken to prevent unwanted pregnancy.

Answer 3

Do you sense extra constructive after your vent? you do not have a question? I trust some belongings you suggested. I agree that extra training and skill into scuffling with the problem of undesirable pregnancies is warranted. i believe there is this contradition about at the same time as abortion is advantageous for particular circumstances and not in any respect for others. yet at the same time as does the embryo/fetus now no longer change right into a parasite? The cells multiply and turns right into a touch one in the womb, and actually it remains a parasite at the same time as growing to be in the womb, it feeds off its mom the finished time. and is no longer that the definition of a parasite? One residing creature residing off yet another? So i detect your attitude type of harsh, you're searching at those cells (definite a conceivable infant) like it is a tumour or a cancerous boom, a diseased tissue that ought to be discarded. You call an abortion "a medical technique to eliminate a parasitic organism" like it is a tape trojan horse. ok so that you're desirous about abortion, advantageous. yet please do not attempt to reduce abortion to a willy nilly technique, and be so blase about it. You perhaps shocked to hearken to that i'm professional-determination. I do imagine there are 2 aspects to this coin and a call ought to be continually accessible to a pregnant woman/woman. notwithstanding i don't love that abortion occurs and that i imagine it is gloomy. And it isn't only for the lack of a conceivable baby that is a present for a childless couple, yet for the girl/woman who has the abortion. issues do happen, there is no denying that there is achieveable with having an abortion no longer in difficulty-free words actual yet also psychological. a fragile woman who unearths herself pregnant and feels that her in difficulty-free words determination is to abort, i detect is gloomy. Then i think it is gloomy if the more youthful woman opts to shop the baby aswell, because her life is going to be demanding. both way, however determination is made, being pregnant ameliorations this woman's life always. also i don't think of abortion might want to be recognized as a birth control technique, like this is something you are able to continually fall decrease back on. and that i comprehend some females have this attitude and function had countless abortions. i'm particular they'll regrettably go in the route of the leads to a lengthy time period at the same time as they settle on they do opt to have a baby, and locate that too a lot damage has befell to the uterus and miscarriages ensue.

Answer 4

I don't care whether a woman exercises her right of choice if it is done freely! If she wants to have the baby fine!

I know you are probably a Republican by making almost all your argument against those that are pro-choice!

Your last sentence makes no sense!

Yes, I worry about our military that go around murdering and raping children! And I worry about the rights of those, the majority picked up in house searches and sweeps, that aren't charged, don't get a trial and are tortured! I don't care what they did! BUSH INVADED IRAQ if you remember, and if Saddam had of invaded the US you might be in the same damn position!

Girl take responsibility? You want to force a 16 year old to have a baby for no legitimate reason, and then you don't want to support them when they do!

Quit talking out of both sides of your mouth!

Answer 5

well it looks like you gave us the same old argument. Liberals don't care if you get an abortion or not you can get pregnant 20 times in a row and keep them all there point is that a close minded person like you do not have the right to inflict your beliefs on them. Once again you fundamentalists try to backup your mistaken belief to force your agenda on everybody with things that have nothing to do with freedom of choice.

Answer 6

Pro-choicers are that, pro-choice. You can hate the idea of abortions and refuse to have any yourself, and that's your choice. I don't care. I do care, however, when you try to force your morality onto another person. You can be pro-life, but don't try to force everyone else to be that, too. By wanting to take a woman's choice away, you force her to live according to your moral beliefs.

Do 14 year olds who have been raped by their fathers just not "feel like taking on responsibility"? How about the impoverished mother who simply cannot afford another baby, but whose birth control failed? You have to legislate for the worst case scenario, not just for how you want the world to be.

Answer 7

I'm pro-choice. I don't think it's immoral to have an abortion. And I don't think it's fun to have an abortion. And I don't think it's anyone's business but the woman's (and the dad's) if she decides to terminate her pregnancy.

Short enough? Well, I believe my arguments are not very developped, but that's the way you wanted it. i don't see how such an issue (remember that the right to abort was a big step for women's rights) could be summarized so easily.

Answer 8

1) Many people think that it is morally wrong to terminate your pregnancy.
2) Many people who seek aboration really believe that what they are doing is morally neutral
3) Our customs regarding miscarriages indicate that our culture does not place as high a moral value on fetuses and embryos than fully formed babies.
4) In our past, and in many countries today, women and their bodies are controlled by men or the government or religion.
5) In the US we abhor control over women and have a national value of freedom and equality for women.
6) In the absence of moral certainty, and considering the overriding national values of equality and self-determination for women, the Government should withhold punishment for those who seek and are able to obtain an abortion for themselves.
5) Both sides should be able to agree that easy and cheap access to birth control is the best way to eliminate abortion.

Answer 9

i agree with you-but you should say conservative not republican

i personally am pro-choice-i am a woman who does not want to have children-if i dont want to have my own husbands child why would i want some ********* who decided to rape me-but if i did get pregnant with my husbands child i would keep it
if you are raped or are under 18 or realize there is no way yu can take care of a child, you should not be forced to have it
I DO NOT however think it should be used as a form of birth control and DO NOT agree with women who keep pregnancies a secret from b/f's, friend with benefits, fiancees, live in lovers or spouses...if you get pregnant and they want the baby, take responsibility, have the child and let them have it

Answer 10

Oh boy I am sorry but I don't know you that well.now that we are clear.you see,it is okay to hold your views.I could tell you in a hundred words why you are wrong,but you have to understand that the decision a woman makes is between her and her GOD.neither you nor I have the right to determine who aborts a fetus and who does not.my simple question to all the hypocrites out there is before you pass judgment on others why don't you go out and adopt all the children who were not aborted but are languishing in Foster homes?black and white, fit and disabled.then come back to me and we would start a real conversation.until then you have no right morally and spiritually to pass judgment on anyone.