English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

yes! this aint the chris rock show how many peieces of gum can I git for 10 cent? businesses do want to hear that crack head mentalitiy ,they just want their money thats why they charge adult prices for 11 year olds who are not adults until age 21

2006-10-25 05:25:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes they are supposed to pay full price. Think about this, the theaters aren't just putting the price for the person's sake, it's for the their sake. So by going to the movie's to watch them in 3-D, you have there-by taken a seat from another person, thus costing the exact same amount as if you could see with both eyes.

Your not really paying for your benefit if you have monocular vision, your paying for that seat that could be used by someone with normal vision.

2006-10-24 10:46:38 · answer #2 · answered by † ¯|¯igerz ßlood † 3 · 0 0

I don't know, I have an astigmatism in both eyes and haven't seen anything in "3 D". Wait till next week and watch Regis and Kelly its supposed to be in 3 D and then we'll know.

2016-05-22 10:09:37 · answer #3 · answered by Shivani 4 · 0 0

no,but i think employees of the movie theater wouldnt allow it for the monocular.

2006-10-24 11:06:45 · answer #4 · answered by murder 101* <3 ^_^ 2 · 0 0

Well I'm sure if they have the disorder they'd know not to go and spend the money to watch a 3D movie now wouldn't they?

2006-10-24 10:46:24 · answer #5 · answered by Tracey 4 · 0 0

Good question. Probably not! They should go to the drive up bank machine with the local blind guy who can read the braille on the pin pad.

2006-10-24 10:48:10 · answer #6 · answered by Skanky McSkankypants 6 · 1 0

only if it's a digital one... the red and blue glasses don't work one only 1 eye but if it's digital then 1 eye works fine... think about your question though...should someone whose deaf in one ear be expected to pay full price for a pair of headphones...?

2006-10-24 10:44:34 · answer #7 · answered by ichigo_li2 3 · 1 1

Should a person who is deaf in one ear have to pay full price at a rock concert?

Should a person with only half their teeth have to pay full price at "Joe's All-You-Can-Eat Rib Shack"?

Should a person with only one arm have to pay full price for a long sleeve sweater?

Should a person with only one hand have to pay full price for a pair of gloves?

Should a person with one finger missing have to pay full price for a keyboard?

Should a woman with only one breast have to pay full price for a bra?

Should a man with only one testicle have to pay full price for a pair of underwear?

Should a person with one leg have to pay full price for a pair of pants?

Should a person with one foot have to pay full price for a pair of shoes?

Should a person with one toe missing have to pay full price for a pedicure?

Should a man with a bald spot have to pay full price for a haircut?

2006-10-24 11:00:59 · answer #8 · answered by xeuvisoft 3 · 0 0

I'm not sure, but your question reminded me of Futurama when Leela (who's a cyclops) is at the movie and complains her 3-d glasses don't work...

2006-10-24 10:41:49 · answer #9 · answered by ildjb@sbcglobal.net 5 · 1 2

sure

2006-10-24 10:54:31 · answer #10 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers