English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why are Liberals so pissed about 3000 of my fellow soldiers dying in Iraq but so willing to celebrate and fight for the right to kill 1.3 million babies with abortions every year? Of course we dont want to die but thats a sacrifice we are willing to make to stop a plane from being used to kill anymore Americans. Do you think the terrorists will leave us alone if we leave them alone? Clinton tried that, it obviously didn't work. You want to march for something, march against hypocrisy. We didnt ask you to fight for us, its our job to do it for you. We signed up for it, we do it with honor. Why do liberals insist on pissing all over that? Are they Ungrateful? Go live in a Islamic Extremist country like Iran as a christian for a few years and see how much you like them then.

2006-10-24 09:04:33 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

13 answers

Okay, I see some of the connections you are making. Some peoples beliefs have them shouting against the deaths of solders and all that the military is doing to prevent attacks form hitting us again yet, according to your beliefs, are "killing" 1.3 million babies needlessly every year. Hypocrisy. Iraq started out as a percieved threat to the U.S.. The Congres of the United States voted to allow the military to go in. Since then terrorist have used it as a battle ground. To make things worse, the Iraqis are causing as much trouble as the terrorists. It may be a bad situation, but to pull out no would only eg the terrorists on, as well as setting the stage for future generations of Iraqis to become like the Iranians you speak of. A lot of people don't see the gravity of what is at stake over there. Then we have the media which is about 80% liberal (you know its true) leaking classified information every chance they get. The phone tap thing is a perfect example. I for one do not believe that anyone whos name is in an al qaida phone book is an american citizen anymore, theyre a terrorist. The media tends to forget about how the Vietnamese told us after the war that they would listen to the reports on radio stations in America for moral support during the war. The even admitted that without the Media undermining the U.S. Government they may not have won. The media is a major problem. Dems want to free these terrorists and let them run back to the battle field, or worse into our country. Reps want to hold them all indefinitely and torture information out of them. Theres got to be some middle ground that keeps them from killing AND from being abused. Should we be in Iraq? thats debatable. Should we pull out immediately? Absolutely not. We started this and must see it through to the end.

2006-10-24 09:32:08 · answer #1 · answered by AlphaMale 1 · 1 1

The situation in Iraq isn't improving and we are there now. We probably need a new plan for Iraq or to divide them in three parts but that could fail over the dispute of ownership of oils. I can't really see both parties creating a good plan for the terrorists and I think we are gonna have to be tough on foreign affairs and maybe break some human violation rights in order to deal with these terrorists. You think embryos are babies then that is your opinion but I think the federal government can't decide if abortion is illegal or not, I hate it when the government thinks it can decide on personal matters. Abortion is always going to happen even when it was illegal and in happens now in other countries so it's better to recognize that these stuff happens and we could try to save the lives of women and that is why they fight for the right for abortion. Did you know that at early stages the embryo doesn't have any human characteristics and people mistake it for embryo monkeys or other animal embryos? Most abortions happen at the early stages and these embryos I can't see them as babies because to me they don't inspire any feeling. Check the link below.

2006-10-24 09:16:27 · answer #2 · answered by cynical 6 · 1 1

I'm confused.

What makes you think the liberals are upset about the military casualties? Because they say so? You guys don't vote Democrat, and neither do aborted babies, but pregnant women tend to.

Bear in mind these are the same people that claim to be demanding Hastert's head in the interest of protecting children, but not a word is said about the several of their own that have gone far beyond mere emails.

This is the party that sponsors negative campaign ads against conservatives, and even liberals who have ever voted with Bush, and these ads not only don't say anything positive about their own candidate, they don't even mention their candidate by name.

This is the party that still claims Al Gore won the election, but that the USSC appointed Bush in 2000, although the facts are easily obtained on the internet.

This is the party that criticizes Bush for our dependence on foreign oil, but blocks exploration in ANWR, blocks wells off California, blocks windmills off of Massachussetts, blocks new facilities to refine oil, and blocks anything with the word "nuclear" in it. This is also the party whose members fly G-5's and drive SUV's while telling everyone that the answer is hybrid cars.

I think you're wasting your time looking for consistency from the Democrats. They have no romance for the truth, and would prefer to read the latest blog that talks about the vast right wing conspiracy or how Bush planned 9/11, despite the total lack of real facts.

Democrats march against hypocrisy? That'll be the day.

2006-10-24 09:19:07 · answer #3 · answered by open4one 7 · 1 2

We are pissed that we are involved in a war that never should have been started in the first place and the right-wing goons keep lying about how everything is just hunky-dory over there. And we're not just pissed about our own 3000 troops dying, we're also pissed about our 20-some thousand wounded and the 100-some thousand dead Iraqis. Are their lives worth any less than our own? The top intelligence folks are now openly agreeing that the war in Iraq has made the US less safe. We're not "pissing all over" your willingness to serve - we're trying to find a way to bring you safely home.

And by the way, abortions don't kill babies. And we (US civilians) weren't attacked during the Clinton years.

2006-10-24 09:22:00 · answer #4 · answered by zmj 4 · 0 2

Are you really so blindsided by Republican rhetoric to think that Iraq has ANYTHING to do with 9/11? Do you think that killing Iraqis is keeping America safe?

I fully support anyone who is willing to stand up and say "Yes... I will defend America... I will be a soldier." But please stop blurring this into a misguided "Liberals are unAmerican."

When all of our troops are in Iraq, or Afghanistan, or having to do the dirtywork when another fight that doesn't concern America is picked... who is going to be left in America to defend America?

2006-10-24 09:17:47 · answer #5 · answered by Suzuki_Mouse 3 · 1 1

Liberals do not like terrorists. They wish we could hunt them down and kill them instead of invading country like Iraq that ahd nothing to do with the attck on WTC 911 bin laden laffed like a hyena when Bush invaded Iraq.
we only ahve so much money and trrops and we should sue them wisely to protact us from real threats and not to bestow unwanted democracy on dictators regimes. there are too many of them. our troops are needed at home to defend us and to be with their families and not running around Iraq being targets for sickos who cannot even get along with each other, while bin laden lolls about in afgahnistan completly safe and plans his next attack on US mainland. tell your buddies we are sorry and hope they make it home safe instead of being blown apart to further the political goals of Bush.

2006-10-24 09:16:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think that the key word in your question is "world". It doesn't matter which country we talk about - we are all responsible for ending world hunger. Local governments in countries such as Republic of Congo have a big role to play, but they need help. In our western society we have many blessings. To whom much is given, much is expected. A thesis statement is the main idea you essay supports. Here are a few sites that may help.

2016-05-22 08:42:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's very easy to confuse a Democrat. Put him/her in a round room and tell them to pee in the corner. First they will demand an investigation into the Republican party for confusing them. Then they will demand that all rooms be square so that all people regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, will have the same opportunity to relieve themselves. Your tax dollars at work under a Democratic administration.

2006-10-24 10:28:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Heres my explanation to your question

First Abortion and the war in Iraq is not a even close comparison.
And its every woman's right to choose what they think is right for them not you.

And unless your head has not been attached to your head, Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11

And do you honestly think that only Conservative serve in the military, and that all soldiers agree with the war? well hate to burst you bubble but there are liberals in the Military and members who do not agree with the move to go to war with Iraq.
My daughters a Vet and her husbands in Iraq.

And hypocrisy? try preaching freedom, to others when your taking it away in our own country. that's hypocrisy

2006-10-24 09:15:41 · answer #9 · answered by Belladonna 4 · 2 2

Well the classic one is Ted Kennedy, but Hillary and Chuckie are closing in fast.

2006-10-24 09:09:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers