this about franklin rossevelt
"he was great drunk. he didnt have polio, he was just to wasted to stand up."
answer 6
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqNY6jZwtDIVljV8QzqzPm7sy6IX?qid=20061024122234AAlYftM
do you agree with him?
2006-10-24 08:35:54 · 12 answers · asked by fireburn 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Absurd. Tell that person to put down his crack pipe & back away slowly.
2006-10-24 08:44:41 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 16⤊ 0⤋
No, he had polio at age 39 and was partially immobile. Yet, he decided to run and got us out of the depression and guided the country in WWII. Some people just don't like him because he was a democrat I admit he had personal flaws but he actually did some good for this country.
2006-10-24 15:39:43 · answer #2 · answered by cynical 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not from things I have read about him, he was a square shooter. People trusted him enough to elect him 4 times. I don't think if he was all of that, they wouldn't have. I wonder if Rush Limbaugh said something like it today on his show. That sounds familiar.
2006-10-24 15:43:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they are nuts... I have been to Warm Springs, Georgia where he was treated for polio. I've seen his leg braces and photographs, and wheelchair that he used.
2006-10-24 15:42:43 · answer #4 · answered by De 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have to pity them because anyone who said that would have to be an idiotic lying Republican who had his/her head up their **** and who in all probability is under the age of 15 years old.
2006-10-24 15:41:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Although I have been known to forget it myself, I do wish people would make a better effort to remember that it's "too" not "to"
2006-10-24 15:44:31 · answer #6 · answered by FrankEs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i completely disagree and they should be ashamed of themselves for saying that. he was a great president who helped this country in many ways.
2006-10-24 15:38:36 · answer #7 · answered by Natethegreat8 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel that this person should be quite before he further embarrasses himself.
2006-10-24 15:40:04 · answer #8 · answered by TEXAS TREY 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why bash a dead man when we have Bush?
2006-10-24 15:39:35 · answer #9 · answered by Preacher 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hah, it's just Shiraz, everyone knows he's a moron and pays him no mind.
2006-10-24 15:39:16 · answer #10 · answered by pip 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋