2006-10-24 08:24:39 · 8 answers · asked by Sassy P 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
I personally think that until or unless it is life threatening (like someone would go to gallows), it is prudent to keep moral codes at the highest level and maintain integrity. The payback seems to be coming slowly or it may never be paid, even then it is never justifiable to break moral codes.
2006-10-24 08:34:57 · answer #1 · answered by Hafiz 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The moral code should have a heirarchy of values so that when there is conflict the more important rule applies. If this is so, it is never justifiable to break the code, and you will never need to break it; you always do what is most important.
Sometimes the heirarchy is unclear. Try to resolve that yourself. I am still in the resolution phase :)
2006-10-24 09:31:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
when the codes you break are in contrast to a greater moral standing which out weights the present dilemma
2006-10-24 08:26:48 · answer #3 · answered by Jaylaw 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it is never justifiable to break moral codes. all a person has is their word and their intregrity. If you taint either one of them, then you are nothing.
2006-10-24 09:43:36 · answer #4 · answered by April 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
When the codes are wrong.
This sounds like a "Fahrenheit 451" type of argument.
2006-10-24 09:10:39 · answer #5 · answered by germaine_87313 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have not heard of this book or author?
2006-10-24 08:34:44 · answer #6 · answered by Ralph 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
when it's convenient for u or sum1 u love and it will work to ur advantage
2006-10-24 08:32:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
NEVER!
2006-10-24 08:32:26 · answer #8 · answered by CHAEI 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋