Just curious.
2006-10-24 07:59:56 · 4 answers · asked by *babydoll* 6 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
NO MA'AM
2006-10-24 08:07:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, and their should not be. Any group that is stating they want promotion for their members are providing the exact the other because they are polarizing their members. A woman who is a member of NOW has a stigma attached to her and puts men on the defensive. From the point of first contact it is a battle between them. Both trying to gain the upper hand. What happens then, you get just that, a winner and a looser. In cases of equality amongst the sexes, is a winner and a looser the best case? Would we not all be better off if it was not a battle, but a common struggle towards a common goal, of equality?
Just a thought.
B
2006-10-24 15:54:39 · answer #2 · answered by Bacchus 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Men, who make up 48% of US population, hold 80% of wealth. The Bush cabinet is almost entirely male. Abortion provision has all but disappeared in the US. Women earn 75 c. on the male dollar.
And men need an advocacy organisation why exactly?
2006-10-24 15:08:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, the male version is alternately called BUSINESS, POLITICS, EDUCATION, and GOLF.
2006-10-24 18:29:18 · answer #4 · answered by Goethe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋