2006-10-24 07:44:44 · 24 answers · asked by omnimog 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Big - time. I think they let it happen. That gives the government more broad, scary, and almost limitless power. Department of Homeland Security? I'll bet its budget is a blank check. Scary! Iron curtain countries had the same type of organizations but they were called things like Ministry of the Interior or the Interior Security Force. In Nazi Germany it was called the Gestapo.
2006-10-24 07:50:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The government always knows things it doesn't tell us. They imagine, sometimes rightly so, that we, the people, are incapable of dealing with what they know or are planning to do. If the authorities told us how many terror cells might exist in our country and where they were, You and I both know that, nobody would be safe to walk the streets. Little, old, retired, Italian deli owners who have lived here for 50 plus years would be beat up by teenagers in the park because they put a cloth over their face to keep the sun off. People in fear do horrid things to others. They also can't keep their mouths shut. If the government announced to the people at 8:00 AM that there was to be a SECRET attack on an enemy tomorrow, it would be received by the enemy at 8:10 AM today on CNN. Governments rightly or wrongly have to "keep" things from the people.
2006-10-24 07:58:54 · answer #2 · answered by Lynn K 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not a question of if, but of how much and how deep you feel like going down the rabbit hole. I highly recommend 9/11 Mysteries if you are interested, a free link to download is below. I wonder why so many documentarians are putting out really well done work for free?
Also see Loose Change, Terrorstorm, Press for Truth, America: Freedom to Fascism, ect.
2006-10-24 07:50:39 · answer #3 · answered by Jared H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i could say: " i could decide to thank all of those people who stored their heads in the sand, allowed the media to tell them what to think of fairly than thinking independently and doing any examine,and pronounced i develop right into a tin-foil hat donning conspiracy theorist". only as a results of fact a number of espouse innovations that the two frighten you or you disagree with, is not any reason to call human beings names. i'm a conservative, who voted for Bush (regrettably), so do no longer say i'm a liberal u.s.-hating communist. real human beings query, sheep stick to blindly. those of you who think of there is not any way the government had any hand in this, evaluate the data surrounding the attack on Pearl Harbor, and the Gulf of Tonkin incident. There are forces at artwork plenty extra beneficial than the U. S. government. :-(
2016-12-08 20:26:26 · answer #4 · answered by fennessey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it since they got so many things absolutely wrong about it and events since then.
That kind of intelligence incompetance does not suggest to me, any ability to hatch up any kind of sophisticated conspiracy.
It is hard to maintain a lie. Lies are much too easy to catch. This bunch has been caught at so many lies that a real conspiracy would long have been unraveled.
2006-10-24 07:48:59 · answer #5 · answered by Vince M 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
And if it ever all comes out, Clinton will end up in prison.
That's why Sandy Berger was caught stealing Top Secret Classified Documents.
He may have saved Clinton from being charged with treason.
He may get nailed yet.
2006-10-24 07:48:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ask Sandy Berger and Bill Clinton,Berger is the one that stole Clintons documents out of the national archives during the 911 commission investigation.Not to mention he also destroyed them which he is finally getting investigated..,I hope they hang his sorry ***.
2006-10-24 07:52:03 · answer #7 · answered by halfbright 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the h*ll is it with people that think their right to know every single thing about every single thing outweighs the right for an entire nation to not have a repeat of 9/11.
What you need to know was shown. See the Naudet Brothers video if you need a clearer explanation.
Who gives a flying f*ck if they know things you don't know, you are not entitled to know everything about everything. Especially when it comes to national security. Like the bank data crap that the NYT finally apologized for informing the world about. That wasn't illegal, and they had to admit it wasn't. Cute. Treasonous bast*rds.
2006-10-24 07:49:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
yes. and the 911 commision showed that there is NO connection between Bin Laden and Iraq. But does that mean anything to a government-policy-maker bent on "appearing correct" instead of being correct?
2006-10-24 07:48:14 · answer #9 · answered by another detroit bassist 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course. I don't think what they know has anything to do with 9/11 conspiracy nonsense, though.
2006-10-24 08:15:26 · answer #10 · answered by Mr. Bojangles 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋