2006-10-24 07:28:45 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
neather.
2006-10-27 15:32:08 · answer #1 · answered by George K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DWI for sure. That can be chalked up to a bad mistake as a youth. Murder on the other hand is usually premeditated and if a politician is doing it, you better believe he has political motivations for it.
Now if the guy was drunk driving and killed someone. Well, then they just in deep trouble I guess.
2006-10-24 14:38:03 · answer #2 · answered by kungfo0master 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DWI. In most cases DWI (first one anyway) is a misdemeanor.
Murder is a felony. A felon can't vote, can one be elected?
2006-10-24 14:36:56 · answer #3 · answered by jooker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well they are both ABOUT the same.
If your drunk behind the wheel you are just as dangerouse, but like Yetti said, I know GOOD people that have DWI's But I don't know any murderers that are GOOD people
But over all
I agree completely with Jaylo, I would rather have a pot head.
2006-10-24 14:37:37 · answer #4 · answered by danksprite420 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DWI...maybe...there are many good people who have gotten a DWI, learned from it. That does not make the bad people....MURDER...hell no...
2006-10-24 14:32:16 · answer #5 · answered by yetti 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a DWI because then i would feel a little bit safer than with a politician who i know is capible of killing someone sober
2006-10-24 14:49:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
non of these 2 choices r considerable, but DWI is less severe than muder.
2006-10-24 14:36:23 · answer #7 · answered by ShaLahLah 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dwi
2006-10-24 14:39:30 · answer #8 · answered by boomer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do we have to elect one with either?
2006-10-24 14:40:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
none of the above
2006-10-24 15:31:55 · answer #10 · answered by Amber 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather have the one who smoked marijuana.
2006-10-24 14:36:38 · answer #11 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋