Given that there is no way to prove experimetaly, it's veracity>
2006-10-24 05:49:11 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
It depends on which physicists you listen to. Some think that it is nothing more than speculation and it's not science because there is no way to test it.
Others think that it is nothing short of the long sought after "Theory of Everything" and that we just haven't advanced technologically enough to test things on such a small scale.
So, at least for the time being, the answer to your question is: both
2006-10-24 06:02:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Physics
2006-10-24 05:50:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
String theory is Physics. Most of the physics theories can be interpreted in philosophy.
2006-10-24 05:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by Sree 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we predict of alike Sue. Quantum mechanics has been peeking out from decrease than the medical curtain for quite a on an identical time as now. they look afraid to return out and say it yet further and extra the flaws they're asserting sound like comparable element the hindus and buddhists have been asserting for hundreds of years. If somebody had the braveness to confess that going any extra is going to require a mixing of physics and a minimum of jap philosophy, the greater dogmatic contributors of the medical community might come after them with pitchforks and torches. A closed recommendations is a bad element.
2016-10-16 08:32:04 · answer #4 · answered by benavidez 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Basically the two definition of physics actually must merge.
Why did Newton call his writing of physics Philosophy?
2006-10-24 06:14:54 · answer #5 · answered by goring 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theoretical physics
2006-10-24 05:50:35 · answer #6 · answered by Blunt Honesty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely physics. Although you are correct that it cannot be proven and is still a theory.
2006-10-24 05:57:06 · answer #7 · answered by charlie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Although it cannot be tested, this would be considered Physics, and is still being pondered upon by, and hopefully proven for his benefit, S. Hawking.
.
2006-10-24 06:07:59 · answer #8 · answered by twowords 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2006-10-24 05:57:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋