English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Im guessing:

- Windows Server 2003 with DHCP enabled? and a Switch

2006-10-24 04:52:03 · 4 answers · asked by jason_kelly@rogers.com 2 in Computers & Internet Computer Networking

4 answers

In terms of hardware, whatever you're sitting at right now has the horsepower to run DHCP for a small-medium business. The only question is software. DHCP's been around a while. There's lots of free DHCP software out there that will make your computer a DHCP server. Google dhcp freeware and take your pick.
For an elegant solution, Small Business Server 2003 comes with DHCP built in, along with a ton of other features. But, it requires some horsepower on the server to run well. If you want a network, use SBS 2003. If you want DHCP, get it for free.

2006-10-24 04:58:25 · answer #1 · answered by antirion 5 · 0 0

Windows Server 2003 with DHCP enabled? and a Switch

Will do what you want, but you need to keep in mind the difference bewtween a switch and a router. A switch will send all data packets to all ports on the switch. A router will "remember" which computer is on which port and send the data to only that port. A router cuts down the network traffic on your network. If you have a small network then a switch might be ok, but a router is the way to go. Besides you will not need W2K3 server because most home routers have DHCP servers built into them now.

2006-10-24 05:01:28 · answer #2 · answered by mbcharney 2 · 0 0

Connecting b/w the two computers, router isn't required, Router is using to hook up with diverse networks, First verify on your router how many ports are there, U could additionally connect the computers by router, if so u can use the two the computers with diverse IP handle additionally... For configuration info u could point out the router variety and manufacture call.

2016-10-16 08:30:01 · answer #3 · answered by benavidez 4 · 0 0

Yup, you've got it. But unless you have another need for a server, a router would be a MUCH less expensive option.

2006-10-24 04:59:27 · answer #4 · answered by Bostonian In MO 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers