Your top public servant set the house on fire - but if you get out- sing the whineing chant "cut and run"

Question

so therefore its best to stay in the "burning house" of Iraq as it collaspses over our heads.

If your house was on fire- would you get out?

- do you think you might be more effective in solving the problem if you were still alive, or as a charred victim?

many "yahoo republicons" would disagree with me-why? because they need to justify the failure that is Iraq today.

I never disagreed with getting Saddam out-
but i never agreed to the mess were in now.

Weapons of mass destruction? - a lie
Relationship to 911- misleading the nation - a lie -
"w" never wanted a war in Iraq - another lie
death toll in Iraq between 400,000 and 900,00 - sadly - true

ok - bring on the heat - but the truth remains...

Answer 1

I agree, I hate the republican "cut and run" thing they used against Dems, its no cut and run, its finding a way out in a REASONABLE amount of time, In the somewhat near future. No one ever said get out by the weekend after the election. They wanted to set realistic time frames to get out.

Gosh now what do the Reps want to do now that they are LOSING-
Hum-- should I say cut and run? after all that's what they said the Dems wanted when they wanted to set time frames to get out of Iraq and turn the country back over to the Iraqis

Answer 2

Ironically, W's press secretary announced yesterday (and made a big deal of it) that W would no longer use the phrase, "stay the course." He said it indicated inflexibility in dealing with Iraq.
Duh!
Where are the neo-cons who scream at democrats for "flip-flopping" now? It was just Aug. 31 that W said, "We will stay the course in Iraq, and will not retreat from that." Retreat took less than 2 months.
Heck, I'm *glad* he's finally letting a little reality sink in -- but obviously you can't believe a word that comes out of his mouth (when it's intelligible...).

Answer 3

FIRST OFF THE IRAQI GOVERNMENT VIOLATED 23 UN RESOLUTIONS WHICH WAS A ACT OF WAR ITSELF! THE IRAQI GOVERNMENT SAID IT HAD WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION! THE UN SANCTIONED THE WAR BECAUSE 21 DIFERANT GOVERNMENTS ALL BELIEVED THEY HAD WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION! THESE WERE ALL LEADING NATIONS,BUT FACE IT IF YOU HAD 5 MONTHS TO DISMANTLE AND MOVE YOUR WEAPONS WHAT WOULD YOU DO WITH AMERICA ABOUT READY TO TAKE OUT THE LEADERSHIP? THE TRUTH IS IRAQI'S NEED TO GET THERE SH!T TOGETHER..WE LIBERATED THEM IN 3 WEEKS! IS IT OUR FAULT THEY COULDN'T GET THERE **** TOGETHER IN 3 YEARS?AND YOU SAY AMERICA IS ALL ABOUT THE OIL! WHEREIS IT? THE PEOPLE CANT AGREE OVER THE OIL FEILDS THERE AND HENCE YOUR CIVIL WAR GENIUS! YOU ALL BELIEVE WHAT YOU WANT!WAR ISN'T A PRETTY THING! BY THE WAY WE AREN'T GOING ANYWHERE AND THE IRAQI GOVERNMENT SAID THEY WOULD DO WHAT THEY ARE DOING AS FAR AS TIMELINES,NOT GEORGE BUSH! GET IT RIGHT! WE'RE THERE TILL IT'S DONE ,NO CUT AND RUN!

Answer 4

Now the real Cut and Run action is about to start.

Answer 5

I hope GWB goes down as the worst president in US history.