does any one else believe the money grabbing W***e's stories?
2006-10-24 04:34:29 · 31 answers · asked by Phil C 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
NO...like you said she's a money grabber Paul McCartney was famous before he met her, so therefore she should be entitled to sweet F A
2006-10-24 04:37:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The more you hear about her the less credible she seems. She must have known all the stories about her would come out so what was she thinking???
Did you read the story about how she was going for interviews pretending to be a journalist who shared her name? She was apparently showing clippings of the other Heather Mills' work and passing it off as her own to get jobs. This was in the paper yesterday being told by the other Heather. It might not be true of course but these stories are mounting up about her aren't they?
2006-10-24 06:55:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i do not, she is a lying, scheming cow. I cannot stand and and all she represents; 'Get Rich Quick'. The whole thing was planned, she has Paul's child now and is set for life. I am glad the little girl has him as a dad and his family, it is awful to have a mother like that. I hope Paul brings her up, otherwise she will be ruined.
2006-10-28 02:52:51 · answer #3 · answered by jacquikuk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she is just publicity grabbing and money grabbing!
If she is awarded any money, it should be only based on the earnings of Sir Paul from when she married - not based on the money he got before!
Even so - never trust a vegitarian!
2006-10-24 04:39:59 · answer #4 · answered by johnfromdon 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It may or may not be true, but is it really necessary to be so vindictive about it and splurge the ugly details around the press, in an apparent attempt to wring a bigger settlement out of him? Not a pretty sight from either point of view.
2006-10-24 04:57:29 · answer #5 · answered by Alyosha 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Answer me this:
Why would any woman tape the arguments she has with her husband?
Ill tell you why,,
Because she knew she could use them against her husband when the time came and thats just what Heather Mills had done.
She is the reason so many of us women get a bad name,she's a nasty woman with 1 thing on her mind
HIS MONEY
The sooner Paul Mccartney gets her out of his life for good the better,his only interest now is his daughter and he is better off without her.
Gold digger of the worst,,thats what she is.
2006-10-24 08:07:32 · answer #6 · answered by freerange00720002000 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Definitely Not, if it was true what she has said especially how Paul,was violent towards her, how comes it never came up in the news that he was that way to Linda. The woman is trying to get anything she possibly can out of him. I feel sorry for the little girl.
2006-10-24 09:16:44 · answer #7 · answered by peach 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I found it hard to believe when it all come out last week and THEN to find out she bugged the house, bugged the phones because he had them done to spy on her. THEN she has it on video tape him beating her what the Flip is that about smacks of "set up, pre meditated and aggravated" to me and THEN she claims he took securtiy away from her and their daughter THEN she claims he beat Linda well that for me was last straw and her most damaging "confession" yet. The woman is cheap as chips and all she deserves is a bag of them STONE COLD and in my opinion far to many THEN'S!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What next?
2006-10-24 07:09:50 · answer #8 · answered by momof3 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I never believed it right from the start. That poor man married her on the rebound and didn't deserve any of this, even if he CAN afford it.
I notice that the "leg to stand on" un-joke has cropped up yet again too.
2006-10-24 04:54:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cant stand her-money grabbing b!tch
dont have much time for paul either-he needs to act his age!dress sense for starters!
2006-10-25 11:56:18 · answer #10 · answered by Abby B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋