http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-10-23-drug-trade-policy_x.htm
2006-10-24 03:48:33 · 11 answers · asked by TxSup 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
sorry. rumsfeld doesn't take good advice. we all know him by now.
2006-10-24 03:50:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sending in the military is what caused the problem.
Under the Taliban, the growth of the opium poppy was illegal.
Afghanistan is now the worlds largest supplier of heroin.
Good job George.
2006-10-24 03:57:43 · answer #2 · answered by rosbif 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
IMO, we should load all the Vietnam-era Agent Orange into C-130s and spray all the fields. No more poppies, no more opium, no more drugs = no more drug problems.
They should grow food instead of drugs. Maybe then they'd stop living in the stone(d) age.
2006-10-24 03:51:32 · answer #3 · answered by et_hates_agame035a 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Under the Taliban: There was actually some sort of a drugs against Islam law that was enforced. Under NATO: Pretty much no order of any kind.
2016-03-28 06:04:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That whole country is a mess. We were never there to liberate the Afghanis we were there to say f*ck you for not letting us build an oil pipeline through your damned country. America has worked with the taliban for years and will continue to work with them
2006-10-24 03:50:44 · answer #5 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Rumsfeld has already screwed up everything he's touched so far, so why give him something else to botch?
2006-10-24 08:24:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Opium!!
2006-10-24 03:53:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm thinking that napalm would be a good cure for those pesky flowers.
2006-10-24 04:05:19 · answer #8 · answered by sethle99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He needs it for himself
2006-10-24 03:51:49 · answer #9 · answered by shaikhmohdmusa 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, that is a soverign country's civil problem.
2006-10-24 03:50:54 · answer #10 · answered by truckercub1275 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋