Omar Sheikh is the man who, on the instructions of General Mahmoud Ahmed, the then head of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), wired $100,000 before the 9/11 attacks to Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker. It is extraordinary that neither Ahmed nor Sheikh have been charged and brought to trial on this count. Why not?
Ahmed, the paymaster for the hijackers, was actually in Washington on 9/11, and had a series of pre-9/11 top-level meetings in the White House, the Pentagon, the national security council, and with George Tenet, then head of the CIA, and Marc Grossman, the under-secretary of state for political affairs. When Ahmed was exposed by the Wall Street Journal as having sent the money to the hijackers, he was forced to "retire" by President Pervez Musharraf. Why hasn't the US demanded that he be questioned and tried in court?
Is Sibel Edmonds, former FBI translator, who translated intercepts from terrorists under a gag order to prevent her from testifying in court?
2006-10-24 03:42:31 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well because the US will work with some governments and wont work with others. Its okay to be a terrorist as long as you are the kind of terrorist that pretends to work with our government
2006-10-24 03:44:55 · answer #1 · answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All that other stuff is too much to read, but yes, the ISI knows and has always known the whereabouts of Osama Bin Laden, yet they refuse to round him up. It's shameful, really.
2006-10-24 03:45:59 · answer #2 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
May be acting to divert attention .but for sure he is not an Angel
2006-10-24 03:47:22 · answer #3 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hihihihi. Paki(stanis) are ally against so called "War on Terrorism"/
2006-10-24 03:50:52 · answer #4 · answered by adraya 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
100,000 bucks didn't do him much good, he is a dead hijacker
2006-10-24 03:48:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋