to neck race. Suspicious? I think so. If you thought Bush had something to do with 9/11 then you have to see the connection with the terrorists and democrats, (chavez calling bush the devil, CNN is now a terrorist propaganda machine as well as a democrat agenda machine, increased bombing in an unpopular Iraq war suddenly 2 weeks before elections)
2006-10-24 01:38:02 · 13 answers · asked by lost&confused 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Whats your opinion, other than I am nuts?
2006-10-24 01:38:27 · update #1
You're nuts. But damn it, you live in a country that gives you the right to be a damned nut.
2006-10-24 01:40:10 · answer #1 · answered by Jason C. 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Yup, Yup, Yup. Just as I suspected, you are nuts.
No not really.
But it is suspicious that CNN would be showing such blatantly pro terrorist stories, but not pro american stories.
Plus there was the state department guy who said Americans are Arrogant and Stupid in Iraq.
The revelation from former KGB person that said Ted Kenneddy tried to ink a deal with the KGB and former Soviet Empire to bring down Ronald Regan's presidency.
I really have reservations about the Democrat party, I think they are not good for our country, they seem to be very devious and anti American.
As much as I disagree with some of the thing the Republicans are up to, and how much I despise what Foley did, I am staying Republicanish in this election. No cut and run Republican here!!
2006-10-24 08:55:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Your nuts is my position, however I think that these bombings will only benefit the repuglicans as they are suppose to be the ones tough on terror. Oh and the reason I think you are nuts is because most Americans on either side of the isle do not side with the terrorist. Democrats just believe there is a better way of fighting terrorism then being in Iraq.
2006-10-24 08:42:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
You are partly right. The terrorists know we are having an election in the states soon, they also know that if the democrats get into office, they will pull the troops out, giving them the power to do what they want. But the other thing is that is their holly time of the year, if you look back at the last few years they always get more aggressive in October.
2006-10-24 08:43:33 · answer #4 · answered by loser 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Chavez gave gas to people, did US Government ever do that. Bush is President, I can respect the office. But I do not choose to respect the man in the office. Even Communists have that right.
Bush wore the Uniform of a Squadron Fighter Pilot, in my understanding of the law, he is a Civilian and that was Impersonating an Officer. Yeah, I know, he is Commander in Chief, but he is a Citizen first.
Least thats the way our old Constitution read.
2006-10-24 08:54:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The terrorist understand that the United States is waffling. They also know that Americans are adverse to lose of life. They are clearly stepping up their terror attacks for political reasons. Unfortunately, the neo-left has grabbed onto the “can’t win the war” attitude and the terrorist are loving it—they can smell victory.
2006-10-24 08:43:25 · answer #6 · answered by damdawg 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Your logic is flawed.
The terrorists stepping up bombings does not help Democrats. It helps repukes more.
Increases the chances of Bush sending more troops and getting free airtime which will improve his rating. Bush is the one who uses these scare tactic to rile up Americans.
And as long as oil prices remain low enough Bush knows that the American public will support him and want him to stay in power longer to fight them.
So as you should see it is more likely that the so-called increase attacks will help Bush.
You can see your thinking is warped, just like your role model.
2006-10-24 08:54:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I don't think you are nuts.. not sure really. I think you are misinformed, and slant your question toward your own political views.
Look at what went on while the different parties were in office. A quick study will show you that liberal doesn't equate to weak. Liberals are veterans, and won WWII
2006-10-24 08:42:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Well what can I say the Liberals support the Enemy, they've been doing it since the Cold War 1st supporting the Communists and now supporting the Terrorists.
2006-10-24 08:41:45 · answer #9 · answered by MrCool1978 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
My opinion is that you justify my low opinions of Republicans. I think its rather immature to link anybody who disagrees with you politically with "terrorist".
I regret ever voting Republican in the past.
2006-10-24 08:41:35 · answer #10 · answered by brian2412 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋