2006-10-23 21:55:14 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
Social Justice is vigilantism. Judicial Justice is law.
Neither one is giving what is due.
To instill a sense of justice you would have to bring back the punishments of the 1700's with the stocks in public where the crime was written and placed by the person for all to see.
Todays law is all about money. If you have enough money you can buy back your freedom if you don't you go to prison.
You get caught speeding do they want to put you in jail NOOOOO !!!
They want your money !!!
If they put you in jail you would cost them money...
:o)
Jerry
2006-10-23 23:35:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is my take on your Question......
In the society that we live in, justice and social values are enforced or imbibed through an elected body. Obviously there is a percentage who did not vote in favor of that elected body......It does remain a question mark if Social Justice is the responsibility of a 3rd Party..
If "you and i" were free to ask for what is "due" to us, that being granted would possibly authenticate the statement "Social justice is giving what is due to whom it is due"
"Social Justice is receiving what is due, to the person who has asked for it"
2006-10-24 05:32:30 · answer #2 · answered by insanely_saneman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with the statement, but how do you enforce it. The statement suggests vigilante justice which will not work in a civilized society.
2006-10-24 05:07:47 · answer #3 · answered by humongousclint 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Such words were on the front gate of Awitsch (Nazi concentration camp). The first word ("social") was not part of the sentence, though.
No, I don't agree. Who determines what is due to whom?
2006-10-24 07:07:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth ended at the close of the first Testament.
2006-10-24 04:57:43 · answer #5 · answered by juliecarlstan 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋