If a² = x then a = ±√x
So √x is of necessity positive. This is the same as as
√3 = + 1.7320508.......
≠±1.7320508.......
The language of mathematics is exact and cannot have two different meanings, otherwise it would not be necessary to use ± in the quadratic formula:
x = (-b ± √(b² - 4ac))/2a
Therefore √x = -2 is not a valid solution because - √x has to equal -2
√x = 2 is the solution of (and √x = -5 is disallowed)
Addendum
1, ,,, for Joe C: x + 3√x - 10 = 0
ie (√x - 2)(√x + 5) = 0
So √x = +2 or √x = -5 Methinks you jumped to an incorrect conclusion
2. x = y² is not a function (it is a parabola with its axis the line y = 0 and vertex at (0, 0) Domain x ≥ 0 Range all y
However it can be broken up into 2 separate functions namely
y = √x Domain x ≥ 0 Range y ≥ 0
and y = - √x. Domain x ≥ 0 Range y ≤ 0
This, of necessity, means √x ≥ 0
3. In realty, the equation x - 3√x - 10 = 0 has a different story to the equation y² - 3y - 10 = 0. This has 2 solutions y = -2 or 5 whereas the previous has only one solution and that is that √x = 5.
2006-10-23 21:53:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Wal C 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Wal C gave a good explanation but reversed his last sentence.
He said,
âx = 2 is the solution of x + 3âx - 10 = 0 = 0 (and âx = -5 is disallowed)
whereas I think he meant,
âx = 5 is the solution of x - 3âx - 10 = 0 = 0 (and âx = -2 is disallowed)
Addendum to Wal C's addendum:
equation is x - 3âx - 10 = 0 not x + 3âx - 10 = 0. I thought you had the best answer in any case.
2006-10-23 22:07:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe C 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
âx is defined to be a positive real number (when working in the reals). When working in complex numbers, it is not necessarily a real number. Therefore, with the restricted domain of â to positive numbers, we have a function. Otherwise, we don't.
How do we see that âx=-2 is NOT a solution to your equation:
Let f(x)=x-3âx-10, and g(x)=x+3âx-10.
Then (fg)(x)=(x-10-3âx)(x-10+3âx)= (x-10)^2-(3âx)^2 = x^2-29x+100 (with our domain restricted to xâ¥0). This is a polynomial function that we all know and love. Since it is a degree 2 polynomial function, it has AT MOST 2 roots (in reals or complex). It is obvious that f and g both have at least 1 root. If one of them had 2 roots, then there would be three roots of the polynomial fg. This is not possible, therefore, there can be only one solution. In particular, there is NO number x (real or complex) such that âx=-2.
Many people have said that â1=±1 since (±1)^2=1. This is not true when working over the real numbers. -1 is a primitive 2nd root of unity (which means that (-1)^2=1, and that all roots of x^2-1 are a power of -1), but when working with real numbers, â1 is defined to be 1. When working with complex numbers, we get some different solutions, thus when working with complex numbers, âx is NOT a function.
2006-10-23 22:25:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Eulercrosser 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
you can't take the square root of a negative real number, unless you are willing to deal with complex numbers, but that's another question.
think of this way
-2x-2=4 or -2squared =4
2x2=4 or 2squared=4
now the square root of 4 is 2 or -2. it is possible
The problem is what is the square root of -4, is it 2 or -2?
The main reason the question asked you to only deal x>0 is that it makes the question easier. Also if x<0 you wouldn't be able to solve this question without using complex numbers. I don't knew complex numbers very well so maybe someone else could help you out before I make it to the library.
2006-10-23 21:50:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Just Wondering 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
if x>0 then âx need not be > 0
But then âx = 5 or âx = -2 from your equation.
So when u say that âx = -2, x = -2 * -2 = 4
So 4 = -2 * -2 or 4 = 2 * 2
-ve * -ve = +ve
Thus here you have all the possible values for
x =4 => âx * âx -- eq 1
where âx = 2 or -2
as âx + 2 = 0 => âx = -2
Thus sating eq 1
2006-10-23 21:41:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by nanduri p 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
âx does not have to be >0. since â of any number is either a positive or negative value. thus if x is>0 . âx is either positive or negative. e.g â4= -2 or +2
so âx can equal -2. remeber negative numbers are always <0
2006-10-23 22:24:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by tomzy 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, sqrt(X) does not have to be greater than 0, only X has to be greater than 0. sqrt(X) can equal -2 because this implies that X = 4 which is greater than 0. Get it?
2006-10-24 00:30:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, the square root of x can be -2, becasue -2 times -2 is 4 which is positive. Negative numbers do not have real roots.
2006-10-23 22:03:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by maggie_at0303 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
the x>0 is only a condition, so thats means you should choose 5 since -2 did not meet the condition
2006-10-23 21:38:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by pao 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes sqrt(x) or the symbol that you have used is > 0. we say solution of
(x-2)^2 = 5 as
x = 2 + sqrt(5) or 2-sqrt(5) to indicate positive square root being taken.
2006-10-23 21:40:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by J 5
·
1⤊
0⤋