English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

Iran will win big and control Shia's oil resources behind the scene. Saudi and other small OPEC countries will be in turmoil because of refugees from Iraq and Iran's increasing dominance. Stock market will tumble all over the world because of potential future war around the area and US's lost prestige . Energy price will skyrocket. We are looking at pretty volatile situation.

2006-10-30 06:01:22 · answer #1 · answered by OilCrazy 1 · 0 0

i think Iraq is a lose lose subject. If Obama gets elected- keep in mind he has to do this well-known- , and pulls our troops out, each and every thing we've accomplished there will be lost. i could study it extra to a Veitnam. The worlds eyes are upon us, and pulling our troops will make us the giggling inventory of the international- back. keep in mind... we havent won, and finished a warfare when you consider that WWII while Germany, and Japan have been defeated. Afganistan, and Iraq are actually not, and are nevertheless crammed with combat... we only took their toys of warfare away. i do no longer likely understand what weve won by way of being in Iraq in the 1st place, and don't likely think of we could desire to continually have taken on Sadaam while shall we've became his united states , or any portion of it to glass on the push of a button if he farted incorrect. We joined a warfare that has been taking place as a results of fact the Bible develop into written, and we're not gonna make all of it a chuffed place no count number how plenty time, money, and lives we supply to the reason. i think of the full international is in for a journey with any of the chosen 3 canidates. None of them are effectual to unravel the themes on the table.

2016-12-08 20:08:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It would become the most dangerous place in the world and for the world. It would turn into a fanatic state with likes of Taliban and Al Queda trying to take charge of the country and use it as a base to launch its attacks.
It would have been safer if Iraq was left untouched....but now that it is done...it cannot be left in its current state.

2006-10-23 19:45:44 · answer #3 · answered by Mohan K 2 · 1 0

The government and military force there is not strong enough to work by themselves. Sunni & Shiite insurgencies will definitely rise because there will be no big bad Army to hold them down.

Basically, now is NOT a good time to pull out of Iraq. The US opened pandora's box, and leaving now without resolving the problem will lead to worse problems for the country and its citizens.

2006-10-23 19:25:01 · answer #4 · answered by deliriusilustratr 2 · 1 0

Wasting less Taxpaying Dollars, Lose Less Lives, Focus More on what we need as Citizens, and the Civil War in Iraq will be none of our Business.

2006-10-23 19:30:04 · answer #5 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 1 0

Civil War

2006-10-23 21:01:54 · answer #6 · answered by fatsausage 7 · 1 0

If we pull out then according to war opponents' logic we should immediately re-invade.

Didn't war opponents say that Saddam didn't have links to terrorism so we shouldn't be there? Well, if we pull out the whole country will be an al Qaeda training ground. So, then according to anti-war logic we should just stay there.

I guess you could say that war opponents are all flaming, idiotic hypocrites.

-Aztec276

2006-10-23 19:29:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The current Iraqi gov't has no chance of surviving... it's weak and there isn't adequate security force. I doubt that the different factions will find a way to work with each other.

2006-10-23 19:36:43 · answer #8 · answered by Kainoa 5 · 1 0

Extremely large amounts of s hit are going to make contact with a giant fan!

2006-10-23 23:48:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

they kill each other off, but it wont make the nightly news anymore

2006-10-24 20:48:12 · answer #10 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers