2006-10-23 18:50:31 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
The personality and morals of the world back then were much different than they are today. This world is going nowhere fast.
2006-10-23 18:58:56 · answer #1 · answered by johnusmaximus1 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with everyone else about the type of movies they are putting out anymore too much blood, sex and where do they get the ideas? from some backdoor to hell? Even Bela Lagose who played Dracula was super scary back then and it didn't require all the throat ripping. The movies were better, cleaner and the actors actually looked like they shaved once in awhile. BUT.. I'm a big fan of Pitrates of the Caribbean, Sean Connery, LOTR and similar movies. Maybe it also has alot to do with the producers. If they demand the best then the movies are good.
2006-10-23 19:31:46 · answer #2 · answered by cas46per 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
movies now are made in color and show graphic depictions of violence and sex. The movies had to get increasingly edgier and racier to compete with television. I personally prefer older movies, plus im a 1940's buff so i think movies were much better than the crap hollywood churns out these days.
2006-10-23 18:55:08 · answer #3 · answered by silverwaif77 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Analog and digital. Actual film tape back then, microchips now. Much of today's modern equipment is digital. It's easy to edit, tranfer, and finish. Instead of years to make a film, it might take one click of a computer mouse to release the movie. Who knows? There are still people, scripts, and settings.
2006-10-23 18:58:45 · answer #4 · answered by palon1957 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
now I'm sorry but that's kind of a stupid question, you didn't list a single thing that you would like to compare between the 2.
But don't you think the image ...the color is different itself...afffff
2006-10-23 18:55:10 · answer #5 · answered by marcela_ipa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One thing is the actors were better. The film, camera, sound and lighting are much better now.
2006-10-23 18:55:09 · answer #6 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the 1940's had better acting and filming...better stories and no 'remakes' or part II's
2006-10-23 18:58:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In 1940, acting was REQUIRED...today, it's optional...IMNSHO, of course...
2006-10-23 18:55:48 · answer #8 · answered by blktiger@pacbell.net 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there were real actors in the '40's
2006-10-23 18:57:59 · answer #9 · answered by ICEMAN 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
everyone smoked in the 40's.... j\k movies were classier none of this violence\sex bull****
2006-10-23 18:56:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋