I've really looked into to this when I was studying the possibility of a draft. If we took over Iraq we'd also take over Iran,Syria, you know the people to control the oil. And to do that would require a big army. But heres the thing... Americans aren't willing to die for their country it they're starting the war only if they're defending themselves. So it would be another Vietnam. And your question is kind of egocentric and racist. No Iraq shouldn't take full blame for it, because not all of its citizens are terrorists. Its not their fault that they are Middle Eastern.. many people are in poverty and saw terrorism as a way to a better life. Just because they're a little deranged because of a hope of better life doesn't mean they are horrible people. I do agree with you though that we shouldn't pull out because that would destroy everything we've done so far.
2006-10-23 18:17:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by ☼Divine Wind☼ 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
You are seriously misinformed.
Iraq did NOT attack us on 9-11.
The attackers came from Saudi Arabia (including Bin Laden), not Iraq.
We need to be going after Bin Laden. Not playing in Iraq.
We have no business attacking and conquering Iraq. We don't own Iraq.
America is NOT about conquering other lands. You seriously need to read the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
America is about freedom. We left Britain to get away from that crap and here you are thinking the same way.
You sound very bigoted in your thinking and should be ashamed. You're like the ancient British, Napolean,and Alexander.
You're not a real American.
2006-10-24 02:23:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Tara662 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a war of terrorim and not on terrorism. There were no WMDs but only lies. The White House is simply a House of White Lies. Here all sorts of email messages, videos and other evidences are created. The Probelm is USA now can nto come out of Iraq or Afghansitan. It is too late as both lands are quciksands. Bush is a Zionist slave and unfortunately he is using USA resoruces and tax payers money to strengthen the interests of Zionists through global state terrorism. He can't simply win, period!
2006-10-24 02:18:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by pathowiz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you serious? Hello....OSAMA BIN LADEN took the credit for Sep 11th and he is Afghanistan. And its not worth conquerring.
Iraq is the birth place of the human race, it is Mesopotamia the land between the Tigris River and the Euphrates River cross and is very historical...we are not entitled to it.
If we are going to conquer some place lets go to Africa and build where the people are more impressionable and there are resources and less religious turmoil.
What kind of freaking American are you? Rights, liberties, happiness is your privilege and you think that it means the right to govern other lands?
Geez...
2006-10-24 01:24:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Candace 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi Chewie. Go read. Your question is a display of your PROFOUND historical IGNORANCE. The world would be a much better place if Saddam was in power in Iraq.
2006-10-24 01:16:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Petra 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I myself have been trying to have some faith in the Ten Commandments. "Thou Shall not kill", is one of them. Or what ever happened to "Judge not less ye be Judged?" Sorry, but I don't think it's fair for our people (including men in general) to be over there giving there life for all of us, and trying to be JESUS and dying, and killing! luv you lots! Do you have some sort of anger inside of you that you want to talk about?
2006-10-24 01:23:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by blondie 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
you ignorant prick, the right to govern those we are destined to own, and that comming from an oaf who is living from paycheck to paycheck
2006-10-24 02:15:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by acid tongue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋