Tell me if I am right or give me your own opinion. I think that the Tuna put in romo so the people in dallas would shut up about bledsoe and romo crap. I just wanted to show the fans that romo aint that good, and that bledsoe is the best QB in dallas. so what you think am i right or am i right, if not say goodbie to the cowboys season if romo gets to play. BOOOOOO romo
2006-10-23 16:53:55 · 6 answers · asked by enano 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I think that at 3-3 the Cowboys should have stuck with Bledsoe. He may not have the mobility, but you have to remember that new QBs don't know the recievers as well and Romo may well lose a few before he gets to know the recievers (He may lose 2 or 3 games, and the Cowboys can't afford that) Plus, making such a dramatic change will shake the rest of the team and throw them off. Romo may well be a decent QB, but the Cowboys can't afford to give him a learning curve. Plus, he did pretty crappy against the Giants. If he screws this up, the Cowboys can't really switch back. I think Parcells took a big risk and may have made a really bad mistake. Better to stick with the experianced QB. Also, Parcells REALLY f***ed up by Putting Romo in for the 2nd half. There was no way Romo could have won that game. Parcells is losing his touch if he thought that that was a good idea. Better to have let Bledsoe have a few more games to prove himself before benching him. They are .500 now, but if Romo plays the way he played in the Giants game, the Cowboys are screwed. So even if Romo is a decent player, Parcells made a huge mistake in my opinion.
2006-10-25 11:01:58 · answer #1 · answered by Football_Fan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe Romo is a good quarterback, but he should NOT have been placed in a situation like that. You do NOT put a QB that has barely played in the NFL in the 2nd half in that situation. However, Bledsoe has TWICE thrown an interception while in the red zone.
The problem is Bledsoe should have been let go a while ago. WHY DIDN'T THEY GO AFTER BREES? We all know Bledsoe is a freakin' statue back there. Put him in shotgun. As slow as he is, by the time he drops back, a DE is already back there waiting for him. The offensive line was attrocious as well today.
Bottom line, this season is lost if they don't figure out what to do IMMEDIATELY...
2006-10-23 17:02:37 · answer #2 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are right. The problem is that Bledsoe was getting hit pretty bad, and he is not a very mobile quaterback. I don't think that Romo sucks, but he is just a rookie and he lacks experience. But, eventually he will come to his peak preformance soon.
2006-10-23 17:21:53 · answer #3 · answered by rayedos69 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i like Romo i think he would improve with playin time
2006-10-23 17:53:22 · answer #4 · answered by antonio c 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think parcels prematurely substituted, shoulda stuck with bledsoe
2006-10-23 17:06:32 · answer #5 · answered by kristen 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
its romo's chance to shine
2006-10-24 15:49:26 · answer #6 · answered by Yahoo! User 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋