English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

For years Bush implied it. He did eventually admit that Saddam was "not" involved in 9-11.

Where's Osama?

2006-10-23 16:45:48 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

15 answers

Just the sheeple.

2006-10-23 17:46:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No one ever said Saddam was behind 9/11. Ever. The deal was that he had WMD's and was supplying them to terrorist organizations like al Qaeda. In my assessment, Bush was wrong. In fact, Saddam was doing a good job of keeping the Muslim extremists OUT of Iraq, and it's all a big mess, but NEVER did Bush say Saddam actually orchestrated the attacks. In my uninformed opinion, we should have just taken out Iran and their psychopathic leader, and bombed the crap out of any other nation threatening terrorist action. Like North Korea. In the end, it's just a big mess and Bush is doing an unsatisfactory job of leading. WE NEED POLITICAL REFORM!!!

2006-10-24 00:23:38 · answer #2 · answered by Leroy Johnson 5 · 0 0

How many ppl really think Osama was responsible for 9/11. Alot of experts don't because 9/11 was an inside job, planned and carried out by elements of the U.S Gov't.

Watch 9/11 Mysteries, Impobable Collapse, and Terror Storm on Google video.
if you are interested in doing some reading go to www.st911.org
Some great books are 9/11 Synthetic Terror and The New Pearl Harbor.

2006-10-23 23:52:58 · answer #3 · answered by Luke F 3 · 1 2

Only an idiot would even pass along the story that Sadam was
responsible for 9-11...
NO ONE with any sense EVER said this was the case...

2006-10-23 23:54:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No one, Bush never implied that Sadam was responsible for 9-11. He has said that Al-Qieda was in Iraq, and they are being captured in Iraq.

Osama has achieved room temperature in a hut somewhere in Pakistan.

2006-10-24 00:38:49 · answer #5 · answered by Jeff F 4 · 0 1

10 people can say he was and 10 people can say he wasn't.........so who is right????

Sadamm would Not let people come in to inspect.......he had months to Move chemical weapons or whatever he Didn't want the inspectors to see. He and his sons killed SO many and buried them in mass graves. (He directed others to kill).

Would you want to just ignore 9-11? Watch those in Iraq on TV.............they are Totally full of hate and go around setting off bombs..........not only there but in other countries. They are also killing Thousands in Africa and would do the same here.

This generation needs to stand up For America Now!!! Wake up Americans.

2006-10-24 00:01:08 · answer #6 · answered by 4263 4 · 0 0

Bush played a bigger role than Saddam ever did.
Check out the documentary Fahrenheit 9/11.
The war has never been about terrorism.
It has always been about oil.

2006-10-23 23:55:03 · answer #7 · answered by - iceman - 4 · 2 2

Bush never even implied that. What his war was the war on terrorism not he war on 911. There are many terrorists who endanger the US not just Al Quaida. I think most people realize this.

Other than pure Kool Aid drinkers, like you..

2006-10-23 23:51:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I don't think Saddam was organized enough to do it. Bin Laden was the mastermind. It took a few years to get that suicide mission off the ground. Tragic, tragic.

2006-10-24 00:03:32 · answer #9 · answered by Cub6265 6 · 0 1

Only Bush and his gang believe that bull, because it serves their purpose to keep their ill planned hoax alive in hopes for an idiot population to re-elect them out of fear.

2006-10-24 00:19:09 · answer #10 · answered by bruxho 3 · 1 0

Same old crap! Get a life will ya? You are not going to change ANY one's mind. The only ones that will rub your tummy are the same ones that did the last time you asked this question Mrs. Clinton. Heh Heh, I got yer number!

2006-10-23 23:59:01 · answer #11 · answered by It All Matters.~☺♥ 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers