English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
1

if u have a gay uncle that has aids,and has to live with his parents because he can not take care of his self because the disease has him in such bad shape,would u let him watch ur 1 year old baby?

this is an actual question?no B.S. here.

personnally i would not,because i care to much about my childs wellbeing and health.

is this wrong?

2006-10-23 16:14:56 · 9 answers · asked by 'HUMVEE' 5 in Family & Relationships Other - Family & Relationships

9 answers

No, it's not wrong, If that's how you feel don't allow your Uncle to babysit. It will only drive you crazy while your child is with him. Talk to your uncle about why you have come to this decision. But when you do, focus on your concerns for him and your child. Not the fact that he is gay and has AIDS. Do you think he would do anything to hurt your baby? Think about it, if he is living with your grandparents, his parents and the child's great grandparents. What do you think could happen? Ask your grandparents for their opinion ... good luck to you

2006-10-23 16:30:57 · answer #1 · answered by msladykm 2 · 0 0

i would have to say no because if he cant take care of his self how is he going to take care of a one year old child and at that age kids are real active they like to play and run around and if he is in that bad of a shape he wouldn't be able to keep up and would if he is really sick and needs to get to the hospital right a way what is you child going to do for him so again i would have to say no

2006-10-23 16:35:25 · answer #2 · answered by sarah l 1 · 0 0

If this is truly a real situation, you should educate yourself on AIDS as you come across as quite rude and uneducated about how AIDS is transmitted.

I wouldn't let him watch my 1 year old because he is sick and you just said he's unable to care for himself ,1 year olds are active and demanding.

2006-10-23 16:21:24 · answer #3 · answered by me 6 · 0 0

do no longer enable what they think of worry you. flow on approximately your existence with your head held severe. maximum each relatives in the international has a modern-day or no longer so distant in the previous relative who's gay or bi. Who knows, the daddy, brother, uncle of 1 of those "so-referred to as" buddies in simple terms may be gay.

2016-10-16 08:09:23 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

If he needs someone to take care of him, then how is he going to take care of a 1 year child who needs help eating, going to sleep, and change his/her diaper? Seriously, no. Do not feel guilt.

2006-10-23 16:18:42 · answer #5 · answered by noxturnxonxred 2 · 0 0

I wouldn't, for the simple reason that if he can't take care of himself he probably can't take care of a child.

2006-10-23 16:17:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no cause i wouldent either plus u said he caint even take care of himself so how can he take care of a child i wouldent risk that find a babysitter

2006-10-23 16:17:51 · answer #7 · answered by Caboose 3 · 0 0

Well...i wudnt too. I know it sounds bad but i just cant let my kid be taken care by him. U r right.

2006-10-23 16:18:21 · answer #8 · answered by ydo 3 · 0 0

No , that is not wrong.If this individual cannot look after himself then please do not leave your child with him.

2006-10-23 16:18:24 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers