6 games and almost 600 yards. On pace to get around 1300+ yards. As much as the Vikings offense has sucked this year, he has been one of the few bright spots. Do you think he is the real deal?
2006-10-23 15:36:25 · 5 answers · asked by enigma_frozen 4 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I believe he is. He had good numbers in the few games he started in Baltimore. He is now in a new, basically rebuilt offense from what started last season for the Vikes, so it takes a little time for them to "mesh". Hopefully, the Seattle game was that point, and things just keep going like they did in that game.
2006-10-24 02:02:34 · answer #1 · answered by Mutt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the men up front are the reason. Tony Richardson and Hutch are the reason. Yes he is a good back but running the football is more to do with the blocking than the running. The best runners always have the best blockers. Neal in SD, Richardson in KC before this year. Their are expections like edge in Indy but that was because the tackling help had to respect the pass
2006-10-23 23:37:27 · answer #2 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think its too early to tell. Like you said, he's the only bright spot in that offense which means he's getting more attention than he would in an offense with better talent all around. I'll pass on him!
2006-10-23 22:40:24 · answer #3 · answered by lilwalker02 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I`m not sure but I do know he gets me a good amount of points in my fantasy league
2006-10-23 23:18:30 · answer #4 · answered by Bouncing on my meat 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he has been for several years.... he was stuck behing that stiff Jamal Lewis for years......
2006-10-23 22:39:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋