A) Having a woman as President
B) Having the number of families without an active father reduced by 70% or more?
(In case anyone is wondering, I did just ask a very similar question. I just replaced 'detrimental' with 'crucial', because I misused the word)
2006-10-23 13:16:28 · 16 answers · asked by woman_of_tomorrow 2 in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
B. Fathers often fail to realize their important in the raising of their children. If only they would step up to the plate more often.
2006-10-23 13:50:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Having the number of families without an active father involved with the children would be a great benefit to all of society as a whole. That would be my choice.
2006-10-24 08:51:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Research shows that families without an active father suffer significant problems and the children are more likely to lack moral direction and be in trouble with the law. Most convicts and prostitutes had no active, or very poor father figure in their lives. This has been an outcome that has been consistant over time. female president...well it is a country by the people of the people right....?
2006-10-23 20:22:10 · answer #3 · answered by Therapist King 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Fathers are a wonderful asset to children. They are integral to their development, and if the father is absent or not involved, finding strong male role models is important to both girls and boys. A woman president may come in the future, but a five year old could care less.
2006-10-23 20:23:54 · answer #4 · answered by mlist32 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
There are alot of countries in this world and it is only the west that seems hell-bent on making a woman a president. What will happen when our US female pres has to sit with all these men presidents from different countries in the world? She'll be the only woman there.
2006-10-23 21:21:27 · answer #5 · answered by dally d 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
B) Having both parents is way more crucial to a childs upbringing. It doesn't matter whether the president is male or female. They don't raise the child.
2006-10-24 01:12:20 · answer #6 · answered by *Michelle* 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
B. Because I think there are alot of single parents out there doing a wonderful job but I really think that 2 parents are so much better for children...I really don't see how single parent families can make it in todays world.
2006-10-23 20:20:43 · answer #7 · answered by marie r 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
a woman president wont have an impact on their lives the same as having a father present in their lives.
2006-10-23 20:22:51 · answer #8 · answered by eric s 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
HELLO “woman _of_ tomorrow”!
Sadly women of tomorrow WILL NOT be like you, it’s unavoidable.
I bet you will like the “eagleforum organization” site, it’s a WOMEN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION that hates feminists, and the bad things feminists are doing to women and to the society in general.
Here is the link:
http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/Feminism/index.shtml
TAKE CARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-10-24 07:49:49 · answer #9 · answered by miniboi6666 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Without a doubt, B.
2006-10-24 00:45:16 · answer #10 · answered by caylinn1996 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋