this country have went to hell
2006-10-23 12:15:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
He said mission accomplished to a mission that had not been accomplished, and still to this day, has not been accomplished. Though its somewhat more complex. He was saying mission accomplished, as in the Iraq government had been overthrown, and yet the mission in its entirty has not been completed. The mission was to invade Iraq, remove Saddam Hussein from power, disarm the WMDs, and create a stable democratic government. The thing is, we only accomplished some of our mission. He did mislead you, me, and the rest of America. Just look into the issues carefully when you decide to vote...no matter which way you choose
2006-10-23 12:16:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wasn't the original "mission" to remove Saddam Hussein from power? You forget, the Republicans sort of forgot to really plan for any kind of "aftermath". That wasn't important, only removing Saddam Hussein from power was. All Bush cared about was "getting the big boss".
Its like a video game. You get to the end of the level and it says, "Mission Accomplished!" Then, you go on to level 2. We're on level 5 now and the final boss is on level 255. His name is Osama bin Laden. To prove that God has a sense of humor, we'll counter that with our own leader - Obama.
2006-10-23 12:16:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by thehiddenangle 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I hope one thing that has changed is that when you personally see a fake, ignorant draft dodging frat boy dressed up with his package buging out of his crotch telling you that "mission acomplished" when it had hardly begun, that you personally know better.
Anyone who is a survivor of the Vietnam era and said openly "never again" about it, should be hanging thier heads in shame these days.
Lets end this, end Bush regime rule, and get some sanity back to the USA.
2006-10-23 12:18:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets see another trillion in debt. Hmmm Wallmart agreed to hire more full time employees. And ahhhh errrrrr The Constitution (that piece of paper) was set aside in favor of the new Signing Statement style of Law.
Go big Red Go
2006-10-23 12:17:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
President Bush had no determination about financing a conflict, we were attacked on 9/11. Mr. Obama had a call about Libya. by technique of helping zionism, u . s . a . of america will be continously at conflict. Iran will be next if we proceed to help zionism. Why might want to u . s . a . of america protect Israeli intrests ? How about helping our personal human beings right here in u . s . a . of america rather of sending 4 billion a year to Israel ?
2016-12-05 03:56:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's just absurd... you haven't paid attention to the news in 3 years? If that's the case you should probably not vote at all.
2006-10-23 12:23:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brooks B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
sir you seem like a reasonable man. president bush and the republican party our still our best hope for the future and to fight the terrorist scum of the world.please do not be misled by the Dem's ,who seek to position themselves for victory in November,bush needs all us loyal republicans now more than ever,as for the misfortunes of the news media reports, i say misinformation by advisers in the field **** happens in war and ,we can not be intimidated by such thing ,hold strong ,America is ready and strong thanks to bush..good day sir..
2006-10-23 12:34:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by CIVILIAN 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow you have not been paying much attention lately. George W. with a vision? Hah!!
2006-10-23 12:17:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
dont vote demorcratic you nut
vote green
your so called president
(as with our MR blair)
have been misleading us for years
get a grip on reality mate
2006-10-23 12:16:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The president just went fishing like you are trying to do.
2006-10-23 12:16:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋