English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If George Snr had done his job properly,the problem would not exist!

2006-10-23 10:23:40 · 19 answers · asked by rosbif 6 in Politics & Government Politics

19 answers

Hello of Course Republicans can Blame Clinton, they are running out of people to blame. Of course we had problems with Iraq before Clinton, and well sorry guys it goes back to a Bush. The better of the two may I add. The game of politics is to take credit for things you don't do, and pass off the blame when you mess up.

2006-10-23 10:27:36 · answer #1 · answered by Victoria O 2 · 2 0

George HW Bush did the job that the UN asked him to do. The job was to get Iraq out of Kuwait. After that, the UN gave the US power to police Iraq. Instead of allowing that to happen, Clinton just tried the Democratic method of "talking." 12 years and 14 UN resolutions later, we still had gotten nowhere. I've never heard anyone blame Clinton for this, but he was in charge for most of that time.

Because of these 14 resolutions, we had every legal right to go into Iraq, and we should have done it much sooner.

2006-10-23 17:28:08 · answer #2 · answered by Chris C 3 · 0 0

It's easy. Watch this.

Bill Clinton forced Saddam to stockpile Weapons of Mass Destruction. Saddam was a very nice man before Bill Clinton put a curse on him.

No problem that proves that the Redster party is the arm of god

Go big Red Go

2006-10-23 17:33:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

True problems with Iraq aren't didn't start with Bush or Clinton, or Bush or Reagan. True problems in the middle east start with one Jimmy Carter.

See the US and IRAN, YES IRAN, use to be ok with each other. Things weren't GREAT but they were ok we got along.Iraq and Iran hated each other and were at war. Then through Mr. Carter's inaction and cowardice nature allowed Iran's government to be seized by a mad man, who was being backed by the Soviet Union.

Now no one in the region liked us. Not the Iranians, and not Iraq, because we had been selling weapons to their enemy. So Regan makes a decision and decides that the enemy of our enemy is now our friend and begins backing Iraq.

A few years later...

Saddam's a crazy mad man, invades Kuwait we go in kick him out. Saddam figures he can't get away with bombing the US but decides to fund people who can. Multiple attacks on US through the 90's when Bill Clinton is in office, he doesn't do much. 9/11 happens and Bush decides to go for the head of the snake...years later, here we are.

2006-10-23 17:45:08 · answer #4 · answered by Marcus720 2 · 0 0

Here Here! But if they cant blame Bill for everything then the light really shines on what a totally rotten job of managing the country that the ruling party has done. If the US government(ALL OF THEM republican or Democrat) were a corporation ALL of the top managers would have been FIRED a long time ago.

2006-10-23 17:28:34 · answer #5 · answered by Chuck P 3 · 1 0

I don't think Republicans ARE blaming Clinton for problems with Iraq. I do, however think there is plenty of blame to go around in regards to the whole terrorism thing. How can you deny that?

2006-10-23 17:26:45 · answer #6 · answered by sacolunga 5 · 0 0

It's a clever diversion to take the spotlight off the current administration. The NeoCons have nothing good to report, so they lay blame rather than take responsibility for the horrendous job Bush and his henchmen have done. Unfortunately, there are a number of nitwits in the country who buy into this load of crap.

2006-10-23 17:31:47 · answer #7 · answered by Hemingway 4 · 1 0

You can blame anybody you want,but the old time American politics took the blame for there own mistakes,today we are lied to so bad we dont know who Is telling the truth and being lied to Is the new American way,sad but true.

2006-10-23 17:27:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Because Billy sat on his *** and did nothing about anything . He also let OBL go because he didn't want him hurt during his capture.

Notable Terror Attacks under Clinton :
Kidnappings of U.S. Citizens in Colombia, January 31, 1993:
World Trade Center Bombing, February 26, 1993:
Attempted Assassination of President Bush by Iraqi Agents, April 14, 1993:
Attack on U.S. Diplomats in Pakistan, March 8, 1995:
Bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City, April 19, 1995:
Attack on U.S. Embassy in Moscow, September 13, 1995:
Khobar Towers Bombing, June 25, 1996: A fuel truck carrying a bomb exploded outside
the US military's Khobar Towers housing facility in Dhahran, killing 19 U.S. military
personnel and wounding 515 persons, including 240 U.S. personnel. Several groups
claimed responsibility for the attack.
Empire State Building Sniper Attack, February 23, 1997:
U.S. Embassy Bombings in East Africa, August 7, 1998:
USS Cole

2006-10-23 17:26:05 · answer #9 · answered by Boredstiff 5 · 0 2

Politics isn't about truth, ma poule. It is about conning the masses so they will vote for you again.
I suspect the Republicans are all envious of Clinton because they too wanted to stick their sigars up Monica Lewinski's fanny.

2006-10-23 17:28:45 · answer #10 · answered by Thou Shalt Not Think 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers