She said on the news that even if the Dems do take the House and Senate there will be no impeachment hearing. Guess she finally had to admit there is nothing there.
2006-10-23 10:02:35 · 8 answers · asked by Meow the cat 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm not mad. I don't want an impeachment hearing. Not because I support the president, but because the country needs to heal. An impeachment hearing would only further divide the country. There is a difference between saying that there will not be an impeachment hearing and that a hearing would be unsuccesful.
2006-10-23 10:12:10 · answer #1 · answered by Tara P 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not an admission that there is nothing there. The is a LOT there. Clinton got impeached because he lied about a bj. What a huge waste of time and energy. Bush got us into a war that has turned into a national disaster, resulted in the death of thousands of U.S. soldiers, undermined our efforts in Afghanistan, and diminished the prestige of the United States--all on false pretenses. He says the purpose of the war was bring democracy to Iraq. What a load of crap. What about Darfour, where genocide by the Muslim government there is a daily occurrence. Why aren't we doing anything there? Here's a hint: it has to do with oil.
Bush should be impeached. But that would only get us President Cheney and a lot more national infighting. Better to work together to try to undo the huge mess that Bush has gotten us in and leave the past in the past.
2006-10-23 10:11:37 · answer #2 · answered by bb80266 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm a liberal Democrat, and I'm mad at Nancy Pelosi anyway. She sucks and has little or nothing to offer by way of policy. She's just a blowhard ideologue. I'll be happy if we win the HOUSE (not likely), but I wish we'd find a better Speaker if we do...
2006-10-23 10:07:19 · answer #3 · answered by Mark M 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A lot of people don't want to spend the money on prosecuting the corruption in government, so to get the vote of conservatives who are angry at their republican leaders, I think they have to say they won't prosecute... But I sure hope the democrats know that to unite the nation, we need to show everyone that no one is above the law.. and to send a strong message to the conservatives that they need to kick out every republican and start over with a new party... When the truth comes out about just how corrupt the republican party is, I believe this will happen..
2006-10-23 10:19:49 · answer #4 · answered by david n 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Don't believe a word of it. She only said that because her outrageous comments were hurting the dems in all the polls. She didn't change at all. Only a game orchestrated by her party.
2006-10-23 10:08:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
nevertheless reason does precede result,the activities that preceded the financial downturn are no longer constrained to what you have pointed out. by way of fact of this historians want to apply time strains,so which you are going to see that the panorama of activities premier as much as the present situation. different than your common timeline,are you able to perceive something happening on the time that could have been contributory to unemployment?
2016-10-16 07:47:26 · answer #6 · answered by leong 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are HUNDREDS, if not thousands, of Dumbya Coup Federal crimes. She is EXTREMELY moderate in dealing with the Dumbya Coup, but going forward I don't think she will take any nonsense. Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2006-10-23 10:21:08 · answer #7 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
lets hope she is the typical politician and lied to win an election. this is the one lie i wouldn't mind a politician breaking
2006-10-23 10:05:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋